In the first OET tests, the WSD devices took a long time to search all UHF channel positions. They apparently need to dwell on each channel position for several seconds in order to achieve the desired sensitivity. In order to detect a mic being activated on a presumed "unused" freq after the initial scan, WSD devices will need to continually rescan on what is now a WSD operational freq, looking for a late mic (et. al.) arrival. The WSD tests should be conducted in an "operational" environment, whereby the devices are kept busy receiving data (at max throughput rate) in order to truly evaluate "scan while operate"....if it's even implemented in the prototypes.... To do otherwise is simply testing the initial, off-line, scan function. Of course, we can already see the glowing press releases being written now, claiming that everything is working perfectly---despite the very limited and artificial construct of the proposed NFL test---just as they are trying to paper over the miserable results from the earlier OET tests.... holl_ands ====================================== Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: At 5:50 PM -0500 11/17/07, Albert Manfredi wrote: >Not exactly a good test. Should work fine, unless someone happens to >be trying to watch the game on TV, a couple of feet from the mike. >Which is not very likely. Uhhhhhh Bert... The test is to determine if the WSDs are able to detect the use of the channel(s) that are being used for the wireless mics. I believe they will test the ability of the WSDs to detect the mic signals, but will not use the transmit capabilities of the tested devices. Apparently its not just the full power stations that are wary of the WSDs. The wireless mics use known unused channels ( at least when the people using them take the time to work with the local frequency coordinator). Given the low power at which these mics operate, this should be an interesting test. Regards Craig --------------------------------- Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage.