Tom; I read the assertion in the summer in a forum that forbids participants from disclosing communications or deliberations. I (silently) assumed the person was wrong, so I reviewed all the documents I had access to, in the state they were in. I had to conclude that they were correct, and a few nits have been removed since then. By the way, the ATSC didn't chose the Harris/LG proposal over the Samsung/Rohde&Schwarz one. That was done by another body, after reviewing the IDOV report. The ATSC's job was to make it all work. John Willkie -----Mensaje original----- De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre de Tom Barry Enviado el: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 5:56 PM Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Asunto: [opendtv] Re: Sixty-three TV stations to launch mobile DTV service this year John - I had not considered all the implications but can easily believe you are correct on this. - Tom John Willkie wrote: > I guess I've been following this closer than all but a few members of this > list. > > E-VSB is likely to be the only mobile broadcast standard approved by the > U.S, to the extent that it 1) is a MOBILE broadcast standard and 2) exists > at all. > > As a practical matter, E-VSB required changes in the A/53 standard. Alas, > M/H doesn't require or involve any changes in A/53 to operate as planned, > hence ATSC M/H doesn't require any approval by the FCC. Basically, the > transmission involves data encapsulation on null packets. No FCC permission > is required to transmit null packets, and the maximum bandwidth that one can > devote to M/H still leaves ample room to send an SDTV-quality signal (plus > audio), plus PSI + psip). > > To the best of my knowledge, no petition to start the process of FCC > approval has even been considered by the relevant parties. > > The potential holdups are on the receiver/cell phone vendor side, not in the > realm of regulation. > > "Game changer" in several regards. > > Something is happening here ... > > Or, I can throw it back to you. Just what in the candidate standard makes > you think that FCC approval is necessary? > > John Willkie, who followed the stops on this (with help) and came to his > conclusión vis a vis FCC approval in mid-summer, 2008. > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En > nombre de John Shutt > Enviado el: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:08 PM > Para: OpenDTV > Asunto: [opendtv] Sixty-three TV stations to launch mobile DTV service this > year > > Seeing as the only mobile standard thus far approved by the FCC for use is > E8-VSB, I wish all the best to the OMVC. > > John > > http://broadcastengineering.com/news/sixty-three-stations-launch-mobile-dtv- > service-0113/ > > Sixty-three TV stations to launch mobile DTV service this year > Jan 13, 2009 8:12 AM > > The first wave of mobile digital television broadcasting will break in 2009 > with the commitment of broadcasters to launch mobile DTV across 63 stations > in 22 markets, covering 35 percent of U.S. television households, the Open > Mobile Video Coalition said. > > During an OMVC press conference Jan. 8 at the International Consumer > Electronics Show in Las Vegas, the alliance of broadcasters backing mobile > DTV announced that 14 of the stations will be NBC affiliates, nine ABC > affiliates, nine CBS affiliates, five FOX affiliates, nine ION Television > affiliates, four CW affiliates and four MyNetworkTV affiliates. Nine > additional PBS stations are in discussions with the OMVC to join the 2009 > launch. > > The OMVC put on a live demonstration of mobile DTV broadcasting to show the > feasibility of the ATSC Mobile DTV Candidate Standard. Several Las Vegas TV > stations broadcast a variety of programming using transmission equipment > from Harris to ATSC-compliant mobile devices made by LG Electronics and > Samsung Electronics. > > The OMVC and ATSC recently announced acceptance of a Candidate Standard for > mobile DTV that will be tested in multiple market trials during 2009, > revised as needed and proposed as a final standard by midyear. > > For more information, visit www.omvc.org. > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.