http://www.multichannel.com/news/fcc/ustelecom-refiles-net-neutrality-challenge/389717
USTelecom Refiles Net Neutrality Challenge
USTelecom did not waste any time refiling its challenge to new FCC network
neutrality rules Monday, saying the FCC decision was illegal overreach, unwise
policy and unnecessary to achieve its aim of an open Internet.
The biggest telecom trade association had filed a lawsuit last month, just in
case the 10-day trigger for being in the lottery to pick the federal court that
hears the case was triggered by declaratory ruling portions of the Feb. 26
vote. It said at the time it filed that it thought it was premature, but had
filed then just in case.
The rules were published Monday (April 13) in the Federal Register, which
inarguably starts a 10-day clock for filings to be considered if the court
holds a second lottery and suits are flied in at least two different circuits.
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, by lottery, consolidated those
first appeals from USTelecom (in the D.C. circuit) and Alamo Broadband (in the
Fifth Circuit that covers its Texas home base) in the D.C. Circuit.
"In challenging the legality of the FCC’s Open Internet order, USTelecom
believes the FCC used the wrong approach to implementing net neutrality
standards, which our industry supports and incorporates into everyday business
practices," said USTelecom President Walter McCormick in a statement. "Our
appeal is not focused on challenging the objectives articulated by the
President, but instead the unjustifiable shift backward to common carrier
regulation after more than a decade of significantly expanded broadband access
and services for consumers under light-touch regulation. Reclassifying
broadband Internet access as a public utility reverses decades of established
legal precedent at the FCC and upheld by the Supreme Court.
"History has shown that common carrier regulation slows innovation, chills
investment, and leads to increased costs on consumers," he said. "The
commission’s overreach is not only legally unsustainable, it is unwise given
the enormous success of the commission’s Title I approach for consumers,
businesses and Internet entrepreneurs, and it is unnecessary given the fact
that broadband service providers are operating in conformance with the open
Internet standards advanced by the President, agree with the standards, support
their adoption in regulation by the FCC under Section 706, and support their
enactment into law by the United States Congress.”