[opendtv] Re: White paper from CEA

  • From: Tom Barry <trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:21:02 -0400

I don't have a cable STB because of the money.  I loved my Comcast PVR 
but then they contacted me and insisted I upgrade to include extended 
basic + digital cable + STB + PVR fees.

I'm back down now to the most basic analog tier, limited basic, paying 
for none of those extras.  For the most part I use cable only for 
broadband now and watch TV only on OTA HDTV.

- Tom

Eory Frank-p22212 wrote:
> Bert wrote:
> 
> 
>>Just because consumers are forced to buy or rent the
>>interface box provided by a TV service provider does not
>>mean that they do this happily. The fact that the
>>majority of cable customers still stick with the analog
>>tier cable, specifically to be able to avoid the STB,
>>should show you what's really going on here.
> 
> 
> How do you know they do this "specifically to be able to avoid the STB"? I 
> suspect the majority of them do so on the basis of costs vs. benefits. The 
> digital tier is an extra monthly charge on top of extended (analog) basic, 
> AND there are monthly charges for each STB. Sure, you get extra channels, and 
> there is a potential if not actual quality difference between digital & 
> analog, but there ARE extra costs. 
> 
> I don't think it's as simple as saying people dislike STBs. But maybe you're 
> right. If so, this explains a lot about the lack of availability of ATSC 
> STBs. If you are loathe to put a box on top of your TV, then it makes little 
> difference whether it's an ATSC box or a digital cable box, or whether you 
> are renting it for a few $/month or buying it outright for $60 or $100 or 
> whatever. You don't want the box at all -- right? 
> 
> 
>>The desire for zillions of channels, or for premium
>>channels, makes it worth the nonsense of dealing with
>>unnecessary interface boxes. It's a price some people
>>may be willing to pay. It doesn't mean they want to go
>>this way as opposed to a better way, or that this is
>>good for the consumer.
> 
> 
> It's not nonsense for me, who happily rents a SA 8300HD dual tuner HD DVR for 
> $15/month from Cox cable. That "unnecessary interface box" has transformed 
> the way my family watches TV and for me is the most effective method I know 
> of for time-shifting my favorite HD shows.
> 
> Having the option to buy a Tivo or other brand-name HD DVR box with CableCard 
> slots, or even a TV set with an embedded DVR is undoubtedly "good for the 
> consumer" -- more choice is always better than less choice. But I am not 
> inclined to spend big $ to own my DVR -- whether it's a separate box or part 
> of the TV set. I spent $3000 on an HD display and that's ALL I want it to be 
> -- a display. When Cox begins offering the 8300HD MR (multi-room) in my city, 
> or a new model comes out with new features and a bigger hard drive, I will 
> happily take my DVR back to the Cox store, get the new box and continue to 
> pay the rental fee. I would NOT be too happy about replacing my expensive 
> HDTV display just because I wanted the latest & greatest DVR.
> 
> 
>>With recording devices, the integral tuner is practically
>>mandatory.
> 
> 
> Absolutely. I would go farther and say "at least two tuners." Motorola found 
> out the hard way with it's first HD DVR, which had only one tuner, that a 
> single-tuner DVR was a non-starter.
> 
> 
>>The question you should be asking is whether
>>this recrding device, with integral tuner, should be
>>available on regular store shelves, or whether specific
>>non-standard models should be dictated by each service
>>provider.
> 
> 
> You know very well that both options -- retail store & provider-specific 
> models -- are available. The question you should be asking is "why are 
> consumers being forced, after 2006, to pay for DTT tuners in retail recording 
> devices, when many of them only want the digital cable tuners or the DBS 
> tuners?"
> 
> -- Frank
>  
>  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
> 
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
> FreeLists.org 
> 
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
> 
> 
 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: