[projectaon] Re: 03btng small illustrations

  • From: Jonathan Blake <blake.jon@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:36:06 -0700

Updated in XML. I'll try to upload a fresh copy to the web tonight.

On 7/29/05, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thomas Wolmer wrote:
> 
> > small2: egg-shaped stone on a pedestal - 275, 350
> >
> > These sections are too close to each other I think. I vote for just 350.
> 
> Yeah, maybe, I guess.

Removed from 275.

> > small4: leaning tower - 211
> >
> > The problem is that this tower doesn't look like the tower does in 50.
> > But oh well, there are no other towers in this book (save the ivory
> > towers of the Singing City, but those don't exactly match either).
> 
> This book is tricky for that. Some of the pics were very difficult to place.

I'm tempted to put this in an unrelated location since it doesn't
really correspond to anything, maybe in the Story So Far or in Sage
Advice?

> > small5: walled city on a hill - 77
> >
> > And 26, I think (a parallell section).
> 
> Makes sense!

Done.

> > small6: bubbling goo -
> >
> > The Swedish edition of the books has this illustration in 67... well,
> > it's in Paradox and there's Oz-na-Mun's clay quarry. I don't think
> > that small10 fits very well here either, so this is my vote.
> 
> It's not great, but it'll have to do, 'cos we're all stumped!
> 
> > small7: shadowy hooded figure - 163, 179, 255, 265, 276
> >
> > In several of these sections I'd move the illustration down a bit.
> > More sections: 236?
> 
> Yeah, maybe. It fits, anyway.

Done and done.

> > small8: wild-haired woman -
> >
> > This must be Tanith, but not in any concrete situation. Somewhere
> > where she is mentioned but not present? Like 278?
> 
> 291, I reckon. "She sways as if about to faint . . ."

Done.

> > small10: the ethetron - 67, 182
> >
> > I don't like 67. In 182 I'd move it down to before the last paragraph.
> > Maybe 59 as well? 338?
> 
> 59 and 338 seem OK. If we plan to put Small 6 in 67, Small 10 must obviously 
> go
> away from there.

Done.

--
Jon

Other related posts: