Hm, more comments on comments... Simon Osborne said: > Thomas Wolmer wrote: >> (??) 04wotw 49: empty vials -> empty Vials [tw: I think...?] > (er) [so: second occurrence only needs changing, you mean?] Technically maybe only the second, but I think it would look very odd, so I'm for changing both. -- Thomas Project Aon workbench: http://www.projectaon.org/~thomas/