[projectaon] Re: Comment Period for Lone Wolf 1-7
- From: Jonathan Blake <jonathan.blake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 20:09:29 -0700
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 07cd
>
> (Equipment) The Lantern has been removed from the list of items.
I presume they removed the Lantern option from Sections 16, 107, etc.?
We sound pretty definitive in our footnote, but do we have a reason?
The most I can figure (without searching the email archives) is that
when you're asked if you have the Lantern, it's often like "Kalte
Firesphere, a Lantern, or a Torch and Tinderbox". This seems to imply
that the Lantern is a self contained light source like the Firesphere.
If this is our justification, we should add that to the footnote.
> (Section 13) Added "(This section is the correct answer to the dial puzzle
> posed in Section 306)" [sic--no period] in itals.
> (Section 34) Added "(this section is the correct answer to the Zakhan’s
> riddle in Section 100)" in itals.
> (Section 100) added ", the text of the section that you turn to will confirm
> that you are correct."
> (Section 306) Added "If you have chosen the correct answer, you will be
> informed of your success when you turn to the relevant section."
I still think these are best handled as footnotes.
> (Section 76) Replaced "combat, and, due" with "combat or any two-handed
> weapon (i.e. Broadsword, Spear, Quarterstaff). Due"
Update text (and get rid of the fussy comma after "and").
> (Section 137) Added "(If you have any Arrows in your Quiver, they have
> fallen out in your fall; you must now erase them from your Action Chart.)"
> (Section 301) Added "If you have any Arrows noted in your Quiver, you must
> now erase them from your Action Chart for they have fallen out and been lost
> during your fall."
That doesn't really fit in the text there. Just seems random. This is
another case where it's better as a footnote.
> (Section 142) Change second Option to "If you win the fight and it lasts
> four rounds or longer, turn to 212."
Adjust the text.
> (Section 148) Added "You may not use the Helmet in conjunction with a Silver
> Helmet if you already possess this item."
Also seems better as a footnote since it is so common sense that you
really shouldn't have to say it, though we talked about carrying the
two at the same time while Mongoose addressed whether or not you could
use them simultaneously.
> (Section 280) Replaced Option 2 with "If you reduce the enemy’s ENDURANCE
> score to zero or below in four rounds or more, turn to 156."
Adjust the text. Also maybe we should change it to simply say "win in
four rounds or more".
--
Jon
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts: