On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 30/08/2012 18:21, Jonathan Blake wrote: >> Getting back to this (i.e. the problem with Wolf's Bane Section 276), >> my feelings are that I can see where this would be a bit confusing but >> we don't have anything authoritative enough to essentially change the >> way this section is played. That's the niche footnotes should play. >> The most I would feel comfortable with is something like the >> following: >> >> "This penalty does not appear to follow the standard rules where Grand >> Masters who fight unarmed lose no COMBAT SKILL. It is not clear >> whether this is intentional or whether it is an accidental use of the >> rules for the Magnakai and Kai series." >> >> The only thing that does, however, is point out that we realize it is >> a bit confusing. > > It covers all angles, so although it's an extra footnote, it seems the best > solution here (unless/until the Mongoose editions clarify things). Footnote added in XML. -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon