(Skrev nedanstående på engelska för utländska listor, men artikeln kan vara intressant här också. --AE) I was reading a book on computers and the history of the information machine, namely Computers - A History of the Information Machine (by Martin Campbell- Kelly and William Aspray, Basic Books, 1996), when I suddently stumbled upon the following passage (abbreviated by me): "In the years between the two world wars a number of leading thinkers began to wonder whether it might be possible to /organise/ the world's knowledge systematically ... The most prominent member of this movement was the British socialist, novelist, and science fiction writer Herbert George Wells ... During the 1930s he wrote pamphlets and articles and gave speeches about his project for a World Encyclopedia. /Wells promoted the idea in the US on a speech tour, also appearing on the radio:/ In his talk, entitled 'The Brain Organisation of the Modern World', Wells explained that his World Encyclopedia would not be an encyclopedia in the ordinary sense: ... This Encyclopedic organisation need not be concentrated now in one place; it may have the form of a network /that/ would constitute the material beginning of a real World Brain." Wells never explained *how* his World Brain would be networked. He mentioned having all information on microfilm, but during his time there were telegraphs, teleprinters, telefaxes and even early television that could be used for sending information. There's one of his articles about the idea on the web ( https://sherlock.ischool.berkeley.edu/wells/world_brain.html ) where he says: "As the core of such an institution would be a world synthesis of bibliography and documentation with the indexed archives of the world. A great number of workers would be engaged perpetually in perfecting this index of human knowledge and keeping it up to date. Concurrently, the resources of micro- photography, as yet only in their infancy, will be creating a concentrated visual record. ... By means of the microfilm, the rarest and most intricate documents and articles can be studied now at first hand, simultaneously in a score of projection rooms. There is no practical obstacle whatever now to the creation of an efficient index to all human knowledge, ideas and achievements, to the creation, that is, of a complete planetary memory for all mankind. ... It can be reproduced exactly and fully, in Peru, China, Iceland, Central Africa, or wherever else seems to afford an insurance against danger and interruption." My computer history book even says Wells was invited to lunch at the White House (in the late 1930s) where he presented his idea of a "World Brain" to president Roosevelt who however "had more pressing problems" (the coming war, no doubt). And "Wells left the lunch a disappointed man." But our World Brain That Came to Be, Wikipedia on the Web, does have an article about the World Brain concept of Wells: http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/World_Brain , noting e g: "World Brain is the title of a book of essays by English author H.G. Wells, written in 1938. ... The essay 'The Brain Organization of the Modern World' lays out Wells' vision for '...a sort of mental clearing house for the mind, a depot where knowledge and ideas are received, sorted, summarized, digested, clarified and compared.' ... A similar view of an automated system for making all of humanity's knowledge available to all had been proposed a few years earlier by Paul Otlet, one of the founders of information science." (There is an article about Paul Otlet too, http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Paul_Otlet , who promoted a similar idea and began implementing it in the form of an information centre, with index cards and files, from which people could order info by mail.) As we can see, the idea of organising all information in the world more efficiently is not exclusive for H G Wells and comes from "a number of leading thinkers", but it seems he was one of the most active *promoters* of the idea - writing books and articles, speaking on the radio, even approaching the White House - and it is important that he proposed the World Brain should a) use modern technology (like microfilm), and b) be distributed. His World Brain is not too far from the Internet and World Wide Web. H G Wells must be considered as the (or an) intellectual father of the Net! And when the first computers came they were often called "Electronic Brains". Another famous information network prediction is by Vannevar Bush in the article "As We May Think" (July, 1945 - available here: http://www.theatlantic. com/doc/194507/bush ) which goes into details about the info retreival system. Bush also assumes some sort of microfilm. H G Wells was a truly original thinker. Not only did he invent the literary ideas of time machines, invisibility and interplanetary wars, he envisioned the tank, warfare in the air, an atomic bomb - and something that comes close to the World Wide Web. But just let me close this little article (or speculation) on how H G Wells "invented" the Net, by pointing towards an even better "prediction" from about the same time. In Murray Leinster's classic short story "A Logic Named Joe" (available here http://www.webscription.net/10.1125/Baen/0743499107/0743499107.htm ) from 1946, we read about a network of "logics" (his word for computer) that resemble PCs or mini-computers, have access to lots of information and can provide services, and even present some sort of multi-media. It is by far the best early description of computers and networks as we know them today. Except for Leinster, most early descriptions of computers in science fiction are pretty lousy and dumb. Most writers could only imagine gigantic super computers, and missed miniaturisation, distributed intelligence, graphical interfaces (old sf computers all talked - like HAL 9000) and most things that we recognise today. --Ahrvid ----- SKRIVA - sf, fantasy och skräck * Äldsta svenska skrivarlistan grundad 1997 * Info http://www.skriva.bravewriting.com eller skriva- request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx för listkommandon (ex subject: subscribe).