[steelers_pb] Re: Schadenfreude

  • From: Phil Brooker <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: steelers_pb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 09:35:49 -0700

The stats are skewed, and used to make media articles more interesting.  Here's the stat I'd like to see - chances of making the playoffs when you're 0-1, etc. versus what the analytics said before the season.  All the terrible teams are included in those 0-1, 0-2... stats, but they were never going to make the playoffs anyway.  I would like to see how the odds change from preseason to after week 1, after week 2, etc.  I bet they're a lot higher for teams initially predicted to make the playoffs.

Phil


On 09/16/2022 8:31 AM, Joe Dies (oldsrocket455) wrote:

If you like to just bathe in the tears of Bungles fans' tears, here's the article for you...

But it posed a question that made me think: how much or how little can/should you read into an opening day result?

In a loss, it's easy to say "ehh, it's just one game, it's a 17 game season, marathon, not a sprint" and all that. But then you hear the stats about your chances of making the playoffs or the SB after starting 0-1, 0-2, etc.

After a win, you could pretty much say the same things as above, but temper them with "don't let it go to your head".

So which is it? What'chall think?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/bass-bengals-loss-brutal-sickening-204407084.html

Joe

Other related posts: