[AR] Re: NASA test of quantum vacuum plasma
- From: "Monroe L. King Jr." <monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 10:03:33 -0700
Some people might tell you you need a neutron detector, you don't if
you get something worthwhile you'll get a flash burn of the palladium
anyway.
Humm you sure about that? I don't think anything or any alloy has more
of an affinity for hydrogen. Got some info on that? I guess that was in
the late 80's I tried that. Perhaps there is some new (old) data?
At the time that was a pretty hot experiment. I remember the joke about
the slightly used Tokamak for sale. Yeah they really thought they had
something. So did I for a while there.
This thruster could go the same way. But what the hay! Sounds like fun.
Monroe
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [AR] Re: NASA test of quantum vacuum plasma
> From: "Michael S. Kelly" <mskellyrlv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, August 10, 2014 9:38 am
> To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Interestingly, I found a paper a few years ago on hydrogen solubility in
> palladium. The paper predated cold fusion by 20 years. It showed that
> alloys of silver and palladium absorbed much more hydrogen, with (IIRC) 40%
> silver peaking at 1,000 times the solubility of hydrogen as pure palladium.
> That was never tried, which showed just how much research went into cold
> fusion.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Aug 10, 2014, at 12:22 PM, "Monroe L. King Jr."
> > <monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > By the way the cold fusion experiment is super easy. Palladium and
> > heavy water and some current. You can buy everything you need to do that
> > for peanuts.
> >
> > Try and cram as much hydrogen as you can into the lattice structure of
> > the Palladium. Try some metallurgy tricks casting the Palladium change
> > the crystal structure. Crap like that. Tried it, it doesn't work. Was
> > fun though!
> >
> > Monroe
> >
> > Don't kill yourself or irradiate your neighbors. (not really much
> > chance of that)
> >
> >> -------- Original Message --------
> >> Subject: [AR] Re: NASA test of quantum vacuum plasma
> >> From: "Monroe L. King Jr." <monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Sun, August 10, 2014 6:50 am
> >> To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >> I'll help ya Joe.
> >>
> >> Monroe
> >>
> >>> -------- Original Message --------
> >>> Subject: [AR] Re: NASA test of quantum vacuum plasma
> >>> From: "James G" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender
> >>> "d0ch011iday@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
> >>> Date: Sun, August 10, 2014 5:19 am
> >>> To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I'll get to it just as soon as I have my Cold Fusion reactor up and
> >>> running... :/
> >>>
> >>> -James
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: joesmith@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> Subject: [AR] Re: Subject: Re: NASA test of quantum vacuum plasma
> >>> Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 12:24:42 -0400
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> All of this armchair speculation and theory according to whoever presents
> >>> it.
> >>>
> >>> How many of you are willing to get off your ass and into the shop and
> >>> attempt
> >>>
> >>> to replicate it? I will,,, I am tied up thru today and Sunday, but
> >>> still I can gather the parts,
> >>>
> >>> and start Monday. Duh.
> >>>
> >>> Joe Smith
> >
Other related posts: