[AR] Re: NASA test of quantum vacuum plasma thruster (was "Anyone heard of this?")

  • From: Ben Brockert <wikkit@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 11:17:38 -0500

And the control that wasn't supposed to make thrust also made thrust,
which suggests that it's not the thruster making force.

On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:15 AM, David Weinshenker <daze39@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> William Blair (Redacted sender wbblair3@xxxxxxxxx for DMARC) wrote:
>> How could they then be certain that air movement caused by the differential 
>> heating
>> of the air within the RF cavity hadn't caused the measured micro-thrust? I 
>> must be
>> missing something because this seems to be too obvious of a potential flaw 
>> in the test.
>
> Well, the abstract (is the full text available anywhere?) did mention a 
> comparison
> run they did with an "RF load" replacing the test device, which seems to be 
> intended
> to control for effects such as you suggest. (If the test device wasn't 
> designed and
> baked out for operation in vacuum, escaping air from crevices, and outgassing 
> of
> surfaces, could conceivably create spurious forces of their own if the 
> chamber was
> pumped down to vacuum.)
>
> -dave w
>

Other related posts: