[AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?
- From: George Herbert <george.herbert@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 12:09:33 -0800
Those would include role (NASA/Space? Military? Amateur?), both arbitrary
(static electricity, accidental connection to wall currents etc) and system
specific failure modes that need tolerating.
For amateur stuff, with igniters typically not shipped installed & disconnected
leads until firing, no fire on typical high end static discharge is probably
good enough.
There are military and NASA specs published if you need to refer to them.
-George
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 5, 2021, at 11:48 AM, Dr Edward Jones <RocketPioneer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Are there 'best practices' or usual standards for NO-fire and
SURE-fire power for amateur solid rockets? I'm developing some
atypical bridgewires. Thanks.
Edward in Socorro
Other related posts:
- » [AR] NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- Dr Edward Jones
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ? - George Herbert
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- Dr Edward Jones
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- Dr Edward Jones
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- JAMES ROSSON
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- Tyler Adkison
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- Peter Fairbrother
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- Peter Fairbrother
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- JAMES ROSSON
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- Peter Fairbrother
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- mark.spiegl
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- mark.spiegl
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- Kevin Ho
- » [AR] Re: NO-fire, SURE-fire ignition standards ?- J P