[AR] Re: Nova for our outward urge?

  • From: "Monroe L. King Jr." <monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 05:11:20 -0700

War is an economy booster. War makes money, jobs ect... They somehow
manage it to look like they loose money but there are gains for the
country waging it to be sure.

Or they would quit doing it

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [AR] Re: Nova for our outward urge?
From: Uwe Klein <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, December 29, 2015 4:48 am
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


Am 29.12.2015 um 11:21 schrieb John Dom:
General Dynamics' (the sub builder) 1963 magazine ideas like Nova
could build a 2001 style rotating space station (ISS follow-up?)
reasonably quickly and start colonizing projects. What space is all
about. http://bayourat.blogspot.com/2010/08/m1-rocket-engine.html
Nova was not even the tallest concept in the sixties. So was going
for S-V only the correct decision: too small I'm afraid for
colonizing Mars.

Wernher von Braun and Willi Ley : everything you want for going to space
( Book and colliers series )
Throw in Clarke's GEO radio repeater stations.

:-)

Kennedy repurposed space for continuing the global pissing contest
in a defanged way. Brilliant.
... and you could vie for one party or the other without
endangering the globes integrity.

Only issue after the game was done the moment to further
progress was gone.
With ( and after ) Reagan the fans of "Global Atomic War" were playing
fast and furious again.
They are now even more entrenched than after Bay of Pigs and Kennedy
fending of the Bomb Lovers.

uwe

Other related posts: