How well does it handle drawings? Modelling is the easy part :) -RM On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Steve Traugott <stevegt@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Graham Sortino < > dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> thanks for the suggestion. i think part of my reason for not going with >> the more professional grade CAD tools is that they are extremely expensive >> and thus somewhat out of reach for hobbyists. I know that in many cases >> there are exceptions to get free or discounted licenses but I do feel like >> its not the same as something that is truly open source or even very >> accessible like Eagle CAD. > > > In case it's not clear to lurkers, all of those I listed (FreeCAD, > OpenSCAD, BRL-CAD, CadQuery, and OpenCASCADE) are free and open source. > > It's pretty clear FreeCAD is going after solidworks users -- part tree, > parametric, constraints, even the background color. > > I was peripheraly aware of FreeCAD but hadn't looked at it in a while. I'm >> definitely at the limit with regards to what I can do in blender so I will >> certainly check this out. >> > > If you've been able to bend blender to your will for doing engineering, > FreeCAD should be a breath of fresh air. ;-) > > Youtube has a lot of FreeCAD tutorials. I haven't watched them myself, > but I've heard good things about Bram de Vries' tutorial series: > https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLVrqzKSVAONHYXc9G9y9wHWus3ManpzUn > > >> As an asside, do you happen to know if FreeCAD can do machine screw >> and/or tapered threads? >> > > Yep. Google shows a bunch of FreeCAD thread libraries, including on > github. If you need something strange, FreeCAD does helical sweeps, lofts, > etc, and for doing even stranger things, you can always drop down into > Python. > > I think the thing most folks here will wish for is production-grade sheet > metal and tubing modules -- there are people playing with different ways of > doing those, but nothing in the mainstream code yet afaik. There is a > generic mesh workbench in there though, which might help with sheet metal. > > And I just now noticed a FEM workbench in the latest version -- I'm > actually surprised to see that there already. > > Steve > > > *From*:"Steve Traugott" <stevegt@xxxxxxx> >> *Date*:Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:16 PM >> *Subject*:[AR] Re: Open Source Igniter / Rocket >> >> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Redacted sender gnsortino@xxxxxxxxx for >> DMARC <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >>Sorry about Blender, I used solidworks and it has a nice helical >>> sweep feature >>> Thanks for the info. I need to get away from Blender but I’ve gotten >>> used to it and can’t seem to kick the habit. >>> >> >> Not to digress (who, us?) but FreeCAD has gotten quite good in recent >> years. It's pretty stable now (you'll still want to save often though) and >> while it's not quite solidworks yet, I now think it's a safe bet that it >> will eventually become a defacto standard -- I just wish they'd change the >> name. >> >> Otherwise, I'm still using OpenSCAD for most things, out of inertia. I >> had high hopes for BRL-CAD a few years ago, but I think FreeCAD has taken >> that space. >> >> For anyone who likes scripting parts like in OpenSCAD, but wants to use >> the more capable OpenCASCADE engine (FreeCAD's backend), there are a few >> options. One is CadQuery, which uses FreeCAD as an IDE or can be run >> standalone with no GUI, such as from a makefile. >> >> Steve >> > >