That's why the pendulum should be a string. -p On Aug 6, 2014 3:04 PM, "Peter Fairbrother" <zenadsl6186@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/08/14 13:18, Aplin Alexander T wrote: > >> Classification: UK OFFICIAL >> >> Handling Instruction: /DISCLAIMER - this is a personal e-mail and only >> represents only the views of the sender/ >> >> Jake Anderson: >> >> I do like the idea of the test being done in basically a clear bell jar >>> >> inside a (large) Faraday cage. >> >>> I also like the pendulum, however I'm less keen on the piezo pressure >>> >> sensor. >> >>> I suggest a laser interferometer aimed at the pendulum. >>> If you want to verify thrust in a direction put 2 test devices on it, >>> >> have the oppose each other, turn one on you should get a displacement in >> one direction, turn it off you should return to zero, >turn the other on >> displacement in the opposite direction, you don't need to make any >> changes inside the test device to perform the test which is nice. >> >> FWIW Jerry Pournelle (SF author and former aerospace engineer who >> previously encountered the ‘Dean Drive’) is also pro the ‘pendulum in >> vacuum’ test method: >> > > > I don't think that's enough - at the least you need two joints, one at the > top and one at the bottom of the pendulum arm. Otherwise a clever fraudster > could simply move the center of mass of the drive/bob to one side, and the > arm would tilt. > > > Worse, even a two-joint arm would not be enough - a suitably oriented > attitude control gyroscope could still cause the main arm to tilt. > > > I'm not sure even three joints is enough, though I'm not certain of that - > spinning up a gyroscope might cause a tilt for long enough > > > -- Peter Fairbrother > > >> http://www.jerrypournelle.com/chaosmanor/dean-drive-and-nasa/ >> >> And >> >> http://www.jerrypournelle.com/chaosmanor/dean-drive-and- >> many-other-matters-a-mixed-mail-bag/ >> >> ** >> >> *Alex Aplin* >> >> "This e-mail and any attachment(s) is intended for the recipient only. >> Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. >> Communications with Dstl are monitored and/or recorded for system >> efficiency and other lawful purposes, including business intelligence, >> business metrics and training. Any views or opinions expressed in this >> e-mail do not necessarily reflect Dstl policy." >> "If you are not the intended recipient, please remove it from your >> system and notify the author of the email and centralenq@xxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:centralenq@xxxxxxxxxxx>" >> > > >