[AR] Re: Way OT question: degerate matter thrusters?
- From: "Monroe L. King Jr." <monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:00:36 -0700
Well so does HP air. Unless your using just a plain ol jet engine like a
ramjet. That would be HP air also.
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [AR] Re: Way OT question: degerate matter thrusters?
> From: "Galejs, Robert - 1007 - MITLL" <galejs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, February 18, 2015 12:55 pm
> To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Supercritical steam does not require heavy tankage?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Monroe L. King Jr.
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 2:47 PM
> To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [AR] Re: Way OT question: degerate matter thrusters?
>
> I think Supercritical steam would be better than air. High pressures require
> heavy tankage.
>
> Monroe
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [AR] Way OT question: degerate matter thrusters?
> > From: "Galejs, Robert - 1007 - MITLL" <galejs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, February 18, 2015 12:35 pm
> > To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > I know this is way off-topic, but it has always had me wondering and
> > it seems like Arocket has the appropriate knowledge base to address
> > this (or, at least wildly speculate).
> >
> >
> >
> > In some of Larry Niven's sci-fi stories, he imagines rocket thrusters
> > (between the ground and orbit) based on super-compressed air
> > (supposedly "nearly degenerate matter"). Would such thrusters
> > theoretically work, or are there some thermodynamic (or other physics)
> > limitations that come into play?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Robert
Other related posts: