[AR] Re: Way OT question: degerate matter thrusters?

  • From: "Monroe L. King Jr." <monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:43:28 -0700

 Ok then I suggest you look into "light gas guns". Perhaps that is what
you seek? Sorry I'm an engineer I can only go just so hypothetical
before I see some proof. Perhaps I did misunderstand that is entirely
possible. The only other method I can think of that makes sense to me is
project Pluto where a nuclear reactor heats the air for propulsion.

 I believe if just compressed air in a tank could provide propulsion for
a rocket we would have done that long ago :) Air breathing rockets are
based on high pressure air and there are some hybrids that use both Air
and chemical propulsion. 

Monroe  

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [AR] Re: Way OT question: degerate matter thrusters?
> From: "Galejs, Robert - 1007 - MITLL" <galejs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, February 18, 2015 1:30 pm
> To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> I believe that that's a bad example.  If I understand things properly, I 
> believe that the ISP of the air alone is higher, but the mass flow with water 
> is much better.
> 
> But you missed my point entirely...  I wasn't trying to optimize anything, I 
> was just trying to see if using hyper-compressed air at some arbitrarily high 
> pressure could be used to get something into orbit theoretically, ignoring 
> obvious engineering issues like tank weight.
> 
> - Robert
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Monroe L. King Jr.
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 3:20 PM
> To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [AR] Re: Way OT question: degerate matter thrusters?
> 
>  Here's a simple experiment to show you. Go down to the toy store and buy 
> yourself one of the old pump up water rockets. Pump it up with air and let 
> her 
> rip. Then fill it with water and try again at the same pressure.
> 
> Monroe
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [AR] Re: Way OT question: degerate matter thrusters?
> > From: "Galejs, Robert - 1007 - MITLL" <galejs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, February 18, 2015 1:10 pm
> > To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > So why is supercritical steam "better" than air?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Monroe L. King Jr.
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 3:01 PM
> > To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [AR] Re: Way OT question: degerate matter thrusters?
> >
> > Well so does HP air. Unless your using just a plain ol jet engine like
> > a ramjet. That would be HP air also.
> >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject: [AR] Re: Way OT question: degerate matter thrusters?
> > > From: "Galejs, Robert - 1007 - MITLL" <galejs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Wed, February 18, 2015 12:55 pm
> > > To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >
> > > Supercritical steam does not require heavy tankage?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Monroe L. King Jr.
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 2:47 PM
> > > To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [AR] Re: Way OT question: degerate matter thrusters?
> > >
> > >  I think Supercritical steam would be better than air. High
> > > pressures require heavy tankage.
> > >
> > >  Monroe
> > >
> > > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > > Subject: [AR] Way OT question: degerate matter thrusters?
> > > > From: "Galejs, Robert - 1007 - MITLL" <galejs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Date: Wed, February 18, 2015 12:35 pm
> > > > To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I know this is way off-topic, but it has always had me wondering
> > > > and it seems like Arocket has the appropriate knowledge base to
> > > > address this (or, at least wildly speculate).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In some of Larry Niven's sci-fi stories, he imagines rocket
> > > > thrusters (between the ground and orbit) based on super-compressed
> > > > air (supposedly "nearly degenerate matter").  Would such thrusters
> > > > theoretically work, or are there some thermodynamic (or other
> > > > physics) limitations that come into play?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Robert

Other related posts: