Jason, there are many people who criticise Islam across the Muslim
region. There are anti Islam movements in Tunisia, Emirates, Kuwait
and here in Egypt. No one prevented them. Here in Egypt, there are
many secular, Coptic and liberal groups who criticise Islam all the
time. They air on television, Youtube, social media, public radio and
even they have local gatherings. I actuallly do not know, where did
you get this falsely stereotypical assumption from? Probably from the
prejudicious media. I do not listen to them nor I even have the time
to respond to their demonstratively fallacious allegations. Because
you live in a far region, you do not recognise many facts about the
Muslim world. Here in Egypt, people may criticise, denounce, defame or
assault Islam but, they will truly be in trouble if they dared just
speaking up against Sisi or his paranoid world. Incidentally, the
latter is steadfastly endorsed by your pro Zionist and supremacist
regime. As to freedom of expression, American media always speaks
about thousands of rockets fired from Gaza to southern Israel.
Virtually, each and every news report about Israel and Palestine
attempts to misportray the situation. They never tell you that these
were often homemade projectiles, defying Israel's aggression on civil
platforms. Why don't you pay Palestine a visit and see how is the
situation yourself? Why don't you come to Egypt and see, how Muslims
and Christians live peacefully together? I sent Jason a report
brought by the Guardian, covering Israel's incessant and explicitly
insensate war crimes but he basically dismissed it. Christian Zionists
hate the truth. They just do not want to hear about it. They hate to
know, that up to ninety percent of Palestinian victims are women and
children, scarcely throwing stones at ranks. They despise to know that
Shaykh Ahmed Yassin whom Israel viciously assassinated on March 22,
2004 was an oldman sitting on a wheelchair. Christian Zionists are
wholly held accountable of waging warfare in the Muslim world.
Christian Zionists are coldly backing heartless carnages. The
colonisation of Palestine was made by formerly the British empire to
be later transmitted to illicitly settled Zionists. The American
Israeli Public Affairs Committee, Pro Israel Political Action
Committees, Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish
Organizations, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy,
Anti-Defamation League, International Fellowship of Christians and
Jews, Central Fund of Israel, Christians United for Israel, Simon
Wiesenthal Center, The Israel Project, Friends of the Israeli Defense
Forces, Women’s Zionist Organization, America’s Voices in Israel, The
Jewish Agency for Israel, Young Judaea and more. Each and every entity
of these manipulate congressional authority, no matter if they are
Republicans or Democrats to unceasingly prioritise Israel's interest,
even if it is against lay American citizens. You may also look up, who
is the founder and owner of the broadly well-known corporal
establishment? The Walt Disney Company. Israel influences America's
major financial companies, political lobbies, educational institutes
and religious denominations. Despite the fact that Israel uses
America's sophisticated munition to murder more innocent civilians,
mass media doesn't mention that. Each and every regular taxpayer buys
a missile for Israel to kill more women and children. Perhaps many of
you dislike to hear that but, truth often is the opposite of what we
like. Southern evangelists including Jason are not as benevolent
as they deceitfully promote about themselves. They are rather malefic
and disingenuous. They aren't doing more in their lives than serving
the devil and pursuing terrestrial objectives. Freedom of expression
is only justified in the west if it is against Islam. This was the
justification mentioned by the bribed Danish draftsman and many
others. But as for the Holocaust's dissembled chronicle, no one could
use the justification of free expression to even reexamine its motif.
This is how double standard is practiced in the western arena. Lastly,
does the west really seek to establish freedom in the Muslim world?
Or, what only matters to them, is to see us and our youth in
particular abandoning faith to anything that is merely a distorted
copy of the west. So eventually, the Muslim is not real one nor he is
even fully western. He is just some stupid thing in between. Don't
worry, I am fully aware of the current situation. I do not need to
hear more about western intent to unbiasedly interact with the Muslim
world. This is simply all fraud. Even the British Council, the
educational institute where I got my certificate in English from has
an agenda and it is not so innocent I am afraid.
Mustafa
On 9/22/18, Jason Meyerson <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mostafa,
Like I mentioned, 1. you are like a broken record and 2. no one wants
you to email them, no one asks for your emails or opinions.
Further, your ideas are skewed. You are missing some key issues. For
one, freedom of speech means you can say what you wish (there are some
extreme situations, a few where this is not true) and not be arrested or
beaten or mistreated for what you say. It does not meant there will not
be a consequence, in the sense that people may turn away from someone or
boycott something or someone or vote or not vote for someone. It means
the speech is not a crime, and if a person responds to legal speech in a
criminal way no matter what was said, the person responding in a
criminal (violent) way is the one who the govt arrests. That the govt
does not punish the person exercising free speech (again we have slander
and inciting violence etc.. some exceptions). The thing is in Muslim
countries, is someone free to criticize or question Islam? or to
challenge it or to declare it false? Can you see the point here?
Muslims and Muslim countries do not permit people to have the right to
freely criticize Islam or criticize Muhammad, in some countries it is
illegal to leave Islam. It is an offense to them. In a free society
offending someone is not a crime. Muslims do not have the courtesy to
offer people freedom of speech or expression. And yet they exercise
that very right that they do not give to others, in criticizing
Christianity or Jesus or the Bible or Judaism or Hinduism or Buddhism or
Bahai etc..
It seems to be a hypocrisy to me.
Thanks
Jason
On 2018-09-22 01:02, Mostafa wrote:
Freedom of speech is the right to express your independent opinions
and convictions in public without being restrained, threatened or
censored. Ordinarily, the United States is prejudiciously portrayed as
the paragon of free expression worldwide. I distinctly destine to pick
Americanism apart. Each and everyone in many regions across the globe
is entitled to opine his opinion freely. The United States did not
invent the right of free expression. It is not exclusive to American
Constitution or its amendments. Freedom of expression is openly
practiced therein as long as Islam is incessantly denigrated.
Nevertheless, if someone oppugned the holocaust or its chronicle's
authenticity, for instance, he is instantly subjected to counterfeit
allegations of antisemitism. This is my endeavour concern of American
double standard. When a Muslim Commits mass murder, he is
unhesitatingly labelled with perpetrating terror. However, if a white
supremacist committed mass murder with even higher rate of fatalities,
he is classified as a demented and atypical individual. I have no
idea, how to illustrate this plain contradiction? How could you be
fairish and oppressive simultaneously? I respect decent Americans. Be
that as it may, as to Americanism, how could you consistently be
guilty, jury and judge concurrently? Freedom of expression is the
major factor by which the United States is allegedly portrayed with
unprecedented prodigy. However, freedom of expression therein seems to
somewhat be infructuous. So for instance, as to America's longstanding
crisis of culpably perennial fatal mass shootings, the National Rifle
Association blocks any congressional bill which aims to relatively
rectify the pitiful situation. For them, the subject is just
unforfeitable. Thence, freedom of expression resembles emptied
rhetoric at some point. If your freedom of expression doesn't allow
you to enact freely, your words may equate some bunch of barking dogs.
Who cares if the dog barks at him? In other words, if the National
Rifle Association listens incautiously to periodical congressional
criticism of irrepressible munition across the nation, what is the
significance of their critique then? What is the point of
congressional authorities being critical of unrestricted gun mongers?
I urge you folks to ponder on my proposition. Yes, here in Egypt,
freedom of expression is perfectly missing. If someone spoke against
Sisi's regime or his coup based governance, he is emphatically
subjected to scathingly be detained, imprisoned and ruthlessly
excruciated. We recognise that and we fairly admit freedom of
expression total absence. This is quite unfortunate but factual. We
couldn't deny it or wrongly fend for the military based dictator.
However, we strenuously strive in the cause of favourably retaining
its prosperity. Liberal media may have spoke against Donald Trump and
his policies of implementing racial disparity in addition to farther
major catastrophes hitherto, they are not able to alter the way he
deliberately perpetrates cruelty. So for instance, as for the issue of
remanded children because their parents immigrated illicitly, why
haven't they been just expatriated along with their families? The
media brought the subject briefly and then, closed the file while the
prob hasn't yet been resolved. Principally, the conception of
unequivocally free speech in the United States is an enormous fib. Do
you know what is really free in the States? It is greed and corporal
establishment. This vividly reflects the dominance of patrician
landholders of the American South as of pastoral panel and other
chiselers. Who could have spoke out against Israel's brutality which
is relentlessly imposed on decently innocent civilians as of women and
children in the congressional arena? There is no one member in the
Congress who could have spoke in the favour of Palestinian refugee
crisis unless he aims to infinitely lose his seat. Is this what you
ironically call freedom? I believe it is crucial to sincerely
reconsider the American portraiture of free expression and measure
that according to actual information. Is American vision of free
expression sufficiently genuine? I won't answer this question for now.
I'll rather leave it at your hand, so you could have a chance to think
about it and come up with the proper answer. I destine to considerably
expand the discussion of this subject because it is of mutual
interest. I at least think so. Thank you for reading, Mustafa Almahdy.
Best wishes, it is always hope that gives meaning to life.
___________________