Dear colleagues in the Educational Data Mining community, my name is Andre Rupp and I am an Associate Professor in the Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, formerly the Department of Measurement, Evaluation, and Research Methods at the University of Maryland in Washington, DC. I had the wonderful opportunity to attend the 2010 EDM meeting in Pittsburgh, which was a great learning and networking experience for me. I am writing to you today because I am the co-chair for the program of the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), which is held in conjunction with the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (see www.ncme.org). Next year the meeting will be held from April 12-16 in Vancouver, BC, Canada, which is a wonderful location (I should know, because I got my Ph.D. from the University of British Columbia there). I wanted to tell you a bit about the NCME community and encourage you to submit a proposal to the meeting, since the orientations of the two communities complement each other very well in my opinion. I think bridging the disciplines of educational measurement and educational data mining is so critical moving forward, especially in times of innovative tools such as digital learning environments, which is one of the reasons why I am the current co-editor of the Special Issue for JEDM. The NCME community is comprised of researchers, professionals working in testing companies, teachers, and other assessment specialists. Its general focus is on educational measurement, which is protypically often associated with the design, implementation, and data analysis for large-scale standardized tests but really includes more than that. In recent years, there has been a decided push for investigating properties of formative assessment systems with diagnostic score reporting, classroom assessment more broadly, policy-making based on data from these assessments, and other related issues. The call for proposals that I created with my colleague and co-chair Joanna Gorin from ASU identifies three orientations for work, (1) methodology, (2) practice, and (3) policy for next year. Historically, it is probably fair to say that most submissions were in the area of methodology, typically with simulation studies and real-data analyses. We are making a renewed and concerted attempt this year to reach out to members of other constituencies to broaden the bouquet of topics, presentation types, and research methods that are being presented. I believe that the EDM community has a range of interesting projects and methodologies to whom NCME members should be exposed for professional development purposes, and vice versa. I know that some of you have already presented at NCME and / or AERA and I hope that you could see the benefits of that. In short, I would love to have EDM community members present some work next year. The process for acceptance is the usual peer-review process so I cannot guarantee an acceptance of your work of course but I am certainly very interested in having more prototypical EDM work presented at NCME. Please consider our conference as a potential outlet for your work. I know that the deadline is coming up relatively shortly - August 1 - and I apologize for not having written this sooner. Nevertheless, you can hopefully create a meaningful proposal, whose length requirements are very reasonable in my view. Joanna and I would be looking very forward to receiving your work in our submission system! Sincerely, Andre Rupp ----------------------------------- Andre A. Rupp, Associate Professor EDHQ Department University of Maryland 1230-A Benjamin Building College Park, MD 20742 Phone: (301) 405-3623 Fax: (301) 312-9245 E-mail: ruppandr@xxxxxxx Web: http://education.umd.edu/EDMS/fac/Rupp.html