----- Original Message ----- From: Ruthi - rsheffer@xxxxxxxxx Subject: the Literature course and acronyms Pardon me for barging in to this discussion. I am not participating in the course because I am honoring the Union Sanctions decision .But having just read a letter about the gripes being raised in the course, I breathe a sigh of relief that I am not in the course ,although I had planned to be there. As a teacher with an MA in comparative Lit and 28 years teaching experience I love teaching Literature even with the lower level kids and struggle to get them to appreciate the stories and poems we teach and the universal messages they bring.However the idea of boiling it all down to HOTS and LOTS and having to grapple with all these buzzwords and "American style "(don't shoot me,guys) jargon just chills me. Why does everything become an acronym? Why do we need fancy terminology? We know all about plot,character, personification, metaphor and all the beautiful things there are in literature, why kill all that stone dead and turn the whole thing into a chore and a gimmick? Can somebody explain the rationale? Why not call a spade a spade and get back to old fashioned lit and grammar ,vocab and spelling ?? Ruth (not anonymous- not scared) ----------------------------------------------- Call for Articles The Etni Rag needs you ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org or - http://www.etni.org.il ** ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** -----------------------------------------------