---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Esther Revivo <estherrevivo@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: HOTS (again :) I am a well-known "unhappiy camper" with the HOTS program, as I teach weak pupils. At our school there will most probably be fewer 4 pointers than in the past. Perhaps MOE wants those between 3/4 points to stay at 3 while those between 4/5 ability stay at 4. That is why I disagree with whoever said that 'there should be either an exam or log for everyone,' which I believe would rob many pupils of the ability to succeed on the D exam. (Although it would be much easier for ME!) My weak yuddies occasionally misinterpret/ misunderstand concepts of HOTS in L1! However I've accepted the fact that sadly, it seems that HOTS are here to stay. I fullheartedly agree with Jennifer when she wrote : "On the other hand, though learning HOTS is important in L1, particularly in grade school and Junior High, I do not like the way it is being tacked on to the literature exam." Neither do I. I'm sure that Adele is correct when she mentioned that in the past, some teachers did NOT teach literature. (Which was depriving them of one of the most important facets of EFL! Such teachers should be ashamed of themselves, although sorrowfully I doubt they are!! ) However, I believe that we should have returned to the old test of yesteryear-- whereby pupils were tested on literature sans HOTS on the exam. Esther Revivo ************************************** ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org ** post to list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** David Lloyd: ETNI founder & manager http://david.greenlloyd.com ***************************************