I strongly disagree with the statement "it is impossible for non-native speakers to achieve full native competence." Obviously, most of our students will NOT achieve full native competence, and that's OK. But saying that no one will is a defeatist attitude. I know many people who have achieved that level of competence despite being non-native speakers with no English-speaking background to speak of. I even have students who come to Israel from Russia in 9th or 10th grade who are almost at that level of competence (there are some fantastic English schools in Moscow), and who are likely to reach the level of native speaker if they continue their English studies for another few years. I'm not saying that we should expect all our students to reach that level - but saying that it's unrealistic and impossible is a defeatist attitude - and unfair to our students who CAN do more. All the best, Rivka Doron wrote: Another point in the "spik Inglish" wars: since it is impossible for non-native speakers to achieve full native competence, it is wrong to hold them to a native-speaker standard. We should talk, precisely, of "competence" in L1, L2, L3, etc., as indeed the European Union, among others, suggests. Laurie will never be mistaken for a native-speaking Bedouin; she can, with work, reach pretty good L3 competence, and be congratulated for doing so. The same is true of Barry's Russian and Ethiopian pupils, and my Arabic speakers - all hope to achieve "sufficiently good" competence in their L3 - English. To expect more is worse than unrealistic, it is unfair and disempowering. Doron ----------------------------------------------- ** The ETNI Rag ** http://www.etni.org/etnirag/ Much more than just a journal ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org or - http://www.etni.org.il ** ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** -----------------------------------------------