Ubuntu hoary (was Re: [Ilugc] Looking back at 2004 - Linux)

From: sridharinfinity@xxxxxxxxx (Sridhar R)
Date: Sat Jan 8 12:21:03 2005

On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:16:15 +0530, Sridhar R <sridharinfinity@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

My conclusions: Hoary is very unstable than debian/sid.  Sid users
would find common breakages in Hoary.  It is easily perceivable from
facts like hoary has gnome2.9 packages, etc ..--after the first
dist-upgrade I had to remove some my gnome settings and gconf stuff to
get it work.  But I still use it :-D

http://windi.halberd.org/index.php?p=3
http://www.whiprush.org/2004/12/on_running_deve.html
http://www.whiprush.org/

--
Sridhar R - http://www.livejournal.com/~sridharinfinity

Follow-Ups:
- Ubuntu hoary (was Re: [Ilugc] Looking back at 2004 - Linux)
  - From: Toufeeq Hussain

References:
- [Ilugc] Looking back at 2004 - Linux
  - From: Toufeeq Hussain
- [Ilugc] Looking back at 2004 - Linux
  - From: Sridhar R
- Ubuntu hoary (was Re: [Ilugc] Looking back at 2004 - Linux)
  - From: Sridhar R

Other related posts:

» Ubuntu hoary (was Re: [Ilugc] Looking back at 2004 - Linux)- Sridhar R
» Ubuntu hoary (was Re: [Ilugc] Looking back at 2004 - Linux) - Sridhar R
» Ubuntu hoary (was Re: [Ilugc] Looking back at 2004 - Linux)- Toufeeq Hussain