[Ilugc] voting - what is the next step?
- From: akumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kumar Appaiah)
- Date: Sat Oct 7 08:08:16 2006
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:08:07PM +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
6. As far as i can see, all voters are genuine members of the mailing
list
frankly I see no profit in publicising the results. I could forward
the results to sriram for verification and publication, but that
would fracture the lug. Chennai lug is the premier lug in india - and
one of the best in the world.
ok guys, what is to be done? do we wait for some magic potion to
wake the zombies? Or do you want the results posted on the internet?
Dear KG,
First of all, I voted against munging; even yesterday, I had to send a
reply off list to a mail message on the list; and I merely had to hit
reply and things worked smoothly. I use the other reply option if I
want to reply to list in my mail client. However, when I do not have
the luxury of using this mail client (Mutt), I also undergo the same
pain which you undergo. Therefore, if most of you are in that
situation, I think the greatest good for the greatest number dictates
that munging must be done!
Now, again, I'd like to know whether Mailman is going to be patched
sometime in future to ask "Munge/Don't munge" along with
"Digest/Individual" on a per user basis. Here's an old thread I found,
but I don't know what came out of it...
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2003-April/015037.html
So, can't Mailman be patched to give this freedom to subscribers? I
couldn't find out the current status, so I ask on the list.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
Other related posts: