Bert - Glad to hear you are enjoying your Accurian Xmas present. I think I=20 mentioned a few days ago I still considered that mostly a winner, at=20 least at that price. I'm sure you have mentioned it before, but could you again describe your = existing antenna situation. (existing fixed rooftop? rotor?) - Tom Albert Manfredi wrote: > First, responding to some points which apply later. >=20 > Craig Birkmaier wrote: >=20 >=20 >>Homes located in rural areas generally require sophisticated >>antenna, typically mounted on tall masts or towers to >>receive distant broadcasts. >=20 >=20 > But obviously it would be best if they did not require a > complicated antenna. The easiest way to get people to > use OTA TV is to show them that indoor antennas are > often sufficient. >=20 >=20 >>Other than locally produced programming such as >>news, this is largely untrue. >=20 >=20 > Largely untrue doesn't mean untrue. UPN, on Saturday > afternoons, has different programs in Wash and Balt, > which I often record for viewing later. This is always > the case, not occasionally. The main networks might > not do this often, during prime time, but occasionally > they do. And when they do, I appreciate having the > choice. >=20 >=20 >>As I said in the previous message, the ability to >>receive distant market signals IS NOT A FEATURE, >>IT IS A PROBLEM. The NFL DOES NOT want you >>to receive a distant signal when a game is blacked >>out in the "local market." >=20 >=20 > But, again, to the consumer, the NFL is being a > nuisance. Consumers like to work around > nuisances, not to be encumbered by them. >=20 > But the main event is that the Accurian box works > quite well, in my very first testing. It is easiest to > say which stations I *cannot* receive, from Wash > and Balt markets. >=20 > I cannot receive Washington UPN 20 and > Washington PBS 26. It's too bad about UPN, > because Baltimore UPN 24 is apparently only > analog? PBS is no big problem, because Annapolis > channel 22 and all its multicasts comes in fine. I > understand that WETA-DT is on a lower tower > and lower power. I know this, because they > once had to transmit analog from it, when their > main antenna had a problem, and the signal was > very bad in analog. Very weak, where we are. >=20 > So that's a lot of channels. Interestingly, virtually > all these come in just fine with either of my UHF > antennas, one being higher gain than the other. > I have yet to try bypassing my antenna amp, > which sometimes helps in DTT reception. And > also curious is that a strange MHz network station, > with a zillion multicasts (many are just color bars) > only comes in with a VHF omni I have. >=20 > So, is ATSC coverage better than analog? Well, > certainly it is for us for Baltimore stations. Far > better, because now they all come in as clear > and sharp as local stations. With analog, some > of the Baltimore stations were quite weak. >=20 > More experimenting to do, with DVI input and > with the aspect ratio choices, and I might try > an indoor antenna downstairs, just for kicks. >=20 > Bert >=20 > _________________________________________________________________ > FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar =96 get it now!=20 > http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ >=20 > =20 > =20 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: >=20 > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at = FreeLists.org=20 >=20 > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word = unsubscribe in the subject line. >=20 >=20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.