Craig Birkmaier wrote: > Now imagine a digital broadcast system that is able to deliver > customized & personalized advertising messages to specific > neighborhoods (zoning), specific demographic targets, even specific > IP addresses. ----------------------------------------- http://news.com.com/2009-1025-5201803.html?part=3Ddtx&tag=3Dntop [ ... ] Industry research tends to support that prediction. An estimated 75 percent of national advertisers plan to cut spending on TV commercials by at least 20 percent in the next five years, when advertisers believe that ad-skipping devices like TiVo will be widespread, according to Forrester Research. [ ... ] ------------------------------------------ Ads targetted to IP addresses already exist. The public tends to reject these much more intensely than the more benign ads you get on TV, on public buses, or on billboards. Devices like proxy servers, firewalls, and the more recent spam filters are aimed *specifically* at this type of ad, and Congress too wants to get in on the act. It's astonishing to me that any ad research would conclude that in the future, that's where all the ad money will go. I would instead predict that this form of ad distribution will quickly peak and drop off, as defenses against it improve. Telephone ads were the prime example of backlash against targetted ads. People object to being interrupted or annoyed more intrusively as opposed to less intrusively, as this sort of targetted ad tends to do. Last time I heard the figures, at least half of US households had subscribed to the do-not-call list. And that was a short time after the list was enabled. On the other hand, replacing TV ads with a new technique for distributing *TV ads* could well work out, but that money would still go to TV businesses. One such technique is product placement right in the program. But inserting ads more intelligently in programs might work too. Of course, the more surgically targetted, the less a broadcast infrastructure is economically viable. I think this is *even* true for those "great ideas" like filling up people's PVRs with ads trickled in over long periods of time. All you're doing is compensating for an inefficient (for this targetted ad purpose) distribution protocol by camping out on people's private property -- i.e. their disk space. I would bet good money that defenses against this will soon appear, if they don't already exist. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.