http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db0412/DOC-305708A1.pdf The interesting stuff starts well in the second half. He says incentive auctions are a win-win for broadcasters and broadband, and a "slam dunk" for the public. I'm not so sure about that last part. At least, not for those who actually use FOTA TV. He says voluntary incentive auctions are voluntary, although the broadcaster might not be allowed to remain in its existing 6 MHz channel. Interesting. He doesn't seem to understand the comment that if two broadcasters share spectrum, mobile DTV will suffer. Or at least, he responds with generalities about "business models," which makes me wonder. He doesn't buy the argument that we need a new broadcast standard first. I tend to agree on that. Unless the "new standards" proponents are prepared for big changes, such as (a) deploying a dense mesh of towers to exploit MIMO advantages throughout market areas, or (b) installing regional networks to allow SFNs to really save on spectrum, I haven't seen any convincing arguments that appreciable amounts of spectrum can be saved with a modulation change. Nor does switching to H.264 seem to have the 2:1 benefits that one keeps reading about. Even the French scheme, where they increased from two to three HD programs in a 24 MHz channel, doesn't support the 2:1 hype. Not unless these are all sports programming, which they are not. (Compare this with the common mix of 1 HD + 3 SD, in a 19 Mb/s channel, with MPEG-2 compression. Assume whatever numbers you like.) But a change to compression would seem like the simplest of all. Perhaps make it a jump to H.265, while we're at it. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.