Craig Birkmaier wrote: > But the deep pockets I am talking about are the ones who are currently > unable to break the existing content and distribution oligopolies. > Companies like Amazon, Apple and Google, or to a more limited extent, > Intel and Microsoft (although it looks like Intel has already given up > on TV). Oh, those deep pockets. Yes, essentially you're talking about adding competing new OTT sites. I'm very much against the idea of equipment makers creating artificial walled gardens, by limiting their devices to only their portals. But in principle, you may be suggesting only that the Intels and the Microsofts create their own, competing OTT sites. Which anyone can use. If the latter, sure, why not? The existing MVPDs could ALSO re-invent themselves that way. Convert their channel lineup into what amounts to OTT sites, available for subscription by anyone with a broadband connection. Compete against all the other MVPDs, everywhere. And in a subsequent step, free up all that bandwidth tied up in the broadcast streams, and make it available for IP traffic. I'm sure the content owners will insist on all manner of geoblocking, for international markets, but imagine the possibilities. The main problem I see is the "vicious cycle of greed" that such potentially wonderful new schemes like these seem to engender. Always prevalent when TV is in the picture, not nearly as much with radio. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.