[opendtv] Re: De-interlacing with HQV high quality video processing
- From: Mark Schubin <tvmark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:22:09 -0400
Displays ARE made that way -- CRTs among them. It was on a CRT that I
saw the problems in the Teranex demo, and what a display does has no
effect on the bit-rate reduction that came before them.
TTFN,
Mark
dgrimes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>While I find interlacing reprehensible, since there are interlaced formats
>that need to be displayed, couldn't displays be designed to display
>appropriate pixels at the appropriate time? Seems to me that it is just a
>matter of clocking in the right pixels at the right time, allowing a
>progressive or interlaced image to be displayed natively. I am sure I am
>showing my lack of knowledge in the architecture of bussing bits in the
>current display technologies. But it seems like something could be
>designed that way. Of course, it doesn't account for the different
>resolutions.
>
>Dan Grimes
>
>
>
>
>
> Mark Schubin
>
> <tvmark@earthlink To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> .net> cc:
>
> Sent by: Subject: [opendtv] Re:
> De-interlacing with HQV high quality
> opendtv-bounce@fr video processing
>
> eelists.org
>
>
>
>
>
> 10/05/2005 11:00
>
> AM
>
> Please respond to
>
> opendtv
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I agree with that, too. But I would add that it's possible that
>progressive source material would be less stressful to the
>bit-rate-reduction process.
>
>TTFN,
>Mark
>
>
>John Shutt wrote:
>
>
>
>>Given all the macroblocking I see in bit-starved HD during fast pans,
>>
>>
>zooms,
>
>
>>and dissolves, interlace artifacts are the least of my worries.
>>
>>John
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Mark Schubin" <tvmark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>I agree.
>>>
>>>When I was first shown the Teranex prototype, they used the classic
>>>"Calendar & Train" sequence to demonstrate their deinterlacing, and they
>>>pointed to the sheep on the wall as being properly deinterlaced. I
>>>pointed to the chrome toy as still showing interlace artifacts. The
>>>Teranex technical staff said, in effect, "Well, no deinterlacer can be
>>>perfect."
>>>
>>>TTFN,
>>>Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>>
>>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
>>
>>
>FreeLists.org
>
>
>>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>>
>>
>unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
>FreeLists.org
>
>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
>
>
>-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
>-- Type: image/gif
>-- File: graycol.gif
>
>
>-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
>-- Type: image/gif
>-- File: ecblank.gif
>
>
>-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
>-- Type: image/gif
>-- File: pic17807.gif
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
>- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
>FreeLists.org
>
>- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts: