Craig Birkmaier wrote: > There is ZERO difference between the magazine I write for and > the commercial TV business. Both need content to attract > "viewers" for the ads. Both use multiple models to pay for > their content. So far, so good. > There would be absolutely NO INCENTIVE for me to create content > for BE if I were not paid, other than the potential benefits of > exposure of my ideas to the people who read the magazine. No one says you wouldn't be paid. Look again at the Freeview model. You could approach BE with a set of articles and ads to go with them, and BE would simply package and distribute what you paid them to distribute. Your income would come directly from the ads. And BE's job would be simplified: just distribute. This is the difference between the Freeview model and the OTA scheme we have here. Your association with BE is much more similar to what broadcasters do here with their affiliates and with the cable companies. > The reason content networks are paying to get their content > onto Freeview is obvious. They can control how they use the > channel(s) and keep all the ad revenue they generate. Bottom > line, if you can generate more revenue than you pay to Freeview > for carriage, you should make a profit. So why don't you work that with BE? Pay them a fixed fee, and see if you can't increase your profit? My point was simple, and I think you missed it. Either model can work just fine. Either you pay BE, as in Freeeview, or BE pays you, as in cable and DBS in the US. There's no reason to ask that question over and over, Craig. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.