[opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable
- From: Ron Economos <w6rz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:35:16 -0800
I'm on a 750 MHz Comcast system here in Silicon Valley. It's still
entirely MPEG-2. Even as an engineer, I'm quite satisfied with the
service. I get 100+ HD channels, and 100 Mbps burst, 50 Mbps sustained
from an internet plan that's advertised as 25 Mbps.
About the only thing that would be nice to have is the secondary HBO,
Showtime and Starz channels on HD.
Craig nailed it when he said "This is a "case study" in why engineers
are rarely successful running companies."
Ron
On 11/24/2015 05:51 AM, Craig Birkmaier wrote:
Cable is not bandwidth constrained Bert. They are having no problem keeping up
with demand for MULTIPLE services. The longer they can keep generating profits
from legacy investments, the more they make.
Waiting is worth money too. The technology is still evolving rapidly, and each
new generation gets cheaper, and/or leverages earlier investments.
Regards
Craig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Ron Economos
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Ron Economos
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Albert Manfredi
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- John Shutt
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Ron Economos
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Ron Economos
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Albert Manfredi
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Manfredi, Albert E
- » [opendtv] Re: Spectrum is too valuable- Craig Birkmaier