Damn, replied to the wrong E-mail! Sorry 'bout that.
THESE issues are both fixed and committed!
--
Simon Osborne
Project Aon
On 08-Apr-16 9:44 PM, Jonathan Blake wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:06 AM, James Durrant
<james.durrant@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:james.durrant@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> > To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > From: outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [projectaon] 24rw Errata
> > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:14:12 +0100
> >
> > Rune War Section 63 says that your boat has provisions amounting to a
> > feast. Yet, in section 88, you are instructed to eat a backpack meal,
> > though the boat has not been looted. Section 138 confirms that you use
> > your provisions to make breakfast the next morning.
> >
> > (See <https://www.projectaon.org/en/svg/lw/24rw.svgz> )
> >
> > (88 --> 138)
> >
> > so: We could either footnote this discrepancy, or change the wording:
> >
> > (er) 8: Before you go to sleep, unless you possess the Discipline of
> > Grand Huntmastery, you must eat a Meal or lose 3 ENDURANCE points. ->
> > Before you go to sleep, you sate your hunger from the provisions
> > provided for your voyage. [so: or similar.]
> >
>
> I'll start by saying I'm somewhat neutral - but I would like to
defend the
> original.
>
> "Unexpected feast" is clearly flavour text. If these are clawing, feral
> creatures, then any untainted food - even a small amount - can be
described
> as a feast.
>
> Presumably, the remains content of the boat would eventually form the
basis
> for provisions.
>
> Also backed up by "arrived too late..." - if there were an abundance
of food,
> it would not disappear entirely so quickly.
>
> I will caveat that I only skimmed the sections - maybe surrounding
content
> sheds more light?
I'm not excited about making this change. It seems a bit trivial, but
138 makes it clear that there's food in the boat. I'm OK with the
proposed change.
> > -----
> >
> > Rune War Section 214: This isn't a language error, but the player
should
> > have been given the opportunity to use the Eye of Lhaz (found in a
> > previous book) here.
> >
> > so: Hmm. We have made a change in 27v Section 70 to add "or an Eye of
> > Lhaz" to an option regarding Animal Mastery, which necessitated a
change
> > to the text of the subsequent section too. Since we've done this in
Book
> > 27, I think we should do this in Book 24 also. So I propose:
> >
> > (er) 214: If you possess Animal Mastery and wish to use it -> If you
> > possess Animal Mastery or an Eye of Lhaz and wish to use it
> >
> > (er) 96: Drawing upon your Grand Master skill, you command -> You
> > command [so: and explain why this change was made in the Errata entry.]
> >
>
> Makes sense to me.
Me too.
--
Jon