On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24/04/2010 18:14, Benjamin I Krefetz wrote: >> >> Only problem I see is that if we make his suggested correction to 282, >> section 236 becomes unreachable. > > That's what I originally thought, but if Section 295 is 'as per original > version', it leads directly to 236 instead of a choice between 207 and 224. > Since the poster was kind enough to post a semi-official fix to the problems > surrounding these files, it would be good to have some kind of "official" > comment as to whether we plan to implement the French-language edition's > fixes, or whether we are happy with our original fixes, or whatever. I just > don't know what the response should be. >_< Is there any benefit to the proposed changes over what we have other than touching fewer sections? -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon