[projectaon] Re: Forum Post

  • From: Jonathan Blake <blake.jon@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:58:42 -0700

On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 24/04/2010 18:14, Benjamin I Krefetz wrote:
>>
>> Only problem I see is that if we make his suggested correction to 282,
>> section 236 becomes unreachable.
>
> That's what I originally thought, but if Section 295 is 'as per original
> version', it leads directly to 236 instead of a choice between 207 and 224.
> Since the poster was kind enough to post a semi-official fix to the problems
> surrounding these files, it would be good to have some kind of "official"
> comment as to whether we plan to implement the French-language edition's
> fixes, or whether we are happy with our original fixes, or whatever. I just
> don't know what the response should be. >_<

Is there any benefit to the proposed changes over what we have other
than touching fewer sections?

--
Jon

~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon


Other related posts: