Exactly - I have no idea how this will be policed.
Sent from my iPhone
On 23 Apr 2021, at 18:58, Tim Brown <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does this mean that an OL lined up as a TE would no longer have to report as
eligible? Isn't this going to be a nightmare for officials trying to figure
out if there's an ineligible receiver downfield?
Tim
On 4/23/2021 1:27 PM, David Reid (Redacted sender davidreidb46 for DMARC)
wrote:
Agreed. I hate it. Have individual exceptions for players on teams who have
retired a bunch of numbers in the certain ranges, but this free for all just
makes it confusing.
Sent from my iPhone
On 23 Apr 2021, at 15:56, Streetr <stlrmn1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm with Brady. It's an absolute nightmare for QBs and their ability to
read defenses.
Streetr
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 5:35 AM Joe Dies <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Oh, and while we're on this... Anyone on Twitter: start circulating the
hash #BLOCKNUMBERS Maybe they'll actually do it.
On Friday, April 23, 2021, 08:28:07 AM EDT, Joe Dies
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dig up... I'm in favor of it. I forget why they restrict what numbers
players use anyway. Screw it, let D linemen wear 25. Let kickers wear 66.
Receivers should still be limited to 80-89, though. Cuz F them, that's
why.
Joe
https://dkpittsburghsports.com/2021/04/22/steelers-players-already-looking-to-trade-jersey-numbers-new-nfl-rule-joe-haden-josh-dobbs-devin-bush-juju-smith-schuster-cdc