Ah Derbhile, that's spot on. Journalists can write a really comprehensive piece but the sub editor is king when it comes to fitting it into the available space. Unfortunately, the writer usually gets blamed for leaving things out when it's really a space issue. If any of you are doing interviews with journalists, it's worth prioritising your bullet points beforehand and making them in a concise manner. It's so easy to get enthusiastic about a given point and the journalist gets lots of quotable things from you and has over-written before incorporating all the issues you want to include. Mark, I'm sure you didn't fall into the trap, this is intended for future reference and comes from someone who has had too much experience from both sides of the media business. Paul _____ From: vicsireland-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vicsireland-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Derbhile Dromey Sent: 02 April 2009 14:16 To: vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [vicsireland] Re: Campaign on move to digital TV urged Hate to say it, but they've only got so much space and they clearly were making an attempt to cover all basis within a couple of hundred words. Ruthless editing was involved, I assure you. My own PC Live piece was bumped back by a month, but should be out in this month's edition. Will keep you posted. That makes mention of audio description! Derbhile _____ I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfighter.com/len> . We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam. SPAMfighter has removed 854 of my spam emails to date. The Professional version does not have this message.