Re: [yoshimi-user] Fwd: Re: eet vor.. oh!

  • From: Will J Godfrey <WillGodfrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: yoshimi-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:23:24 +0000

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:38:48 +0100
Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [yoshimi-user] eet vor.. oh!
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 03:43:36 -0800
From: Jay Capela <jaycapela@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:12 +0100, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:

I'm a bit busy at the moment (which is very rare) but I'll see what I
can do. Maybe it would be best to focus on the Filter parts of the synth
engines and then the controls besides Filter Q (resonance/bandwidth) and
Filter cutoff. So controls like:
* Frequency (Freq. control of the Filter LFO) !!!
* Depth (Depth control of the Filter LFO)
* Attack (A. val of the Filter Envelope)
* Delay (D. val of the Filter Envelope)
* Release (R.val of the Filter Envelope)

Along the lines with what Jeremy has suggested, I feel that MIDI CC
bindings for the ADSR for the amp and filter envelopes AND LFO params
like freq, depth, start and delay are at the top of my list. Also I
think it would be nifty to be able to change the filter category and
filter type on-the-fly via MIDI CC.

Cheers,
Jay Capela

Although all of this sounds nice I think we'd be at risk of a) running out of
control numbers, b) making something too complicated to be easily usable, c)
overloading poor Cal!

--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.


Other related posts: