Re: [yoshimi-user] Fwd: Re: eet vor.. oh!
- From: cal <cal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: yoshimi-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 09:45:09 +1100
On 27/11/10 08:23, Will J Godfrey wrote:
[ ... ]
Although all of this sounds nice I think we'd be at risk of a) running out of
control numbers, b) making something too complicated to be easily usable, c)
overloading poor Cal!
Correct on all three, well done!
At the moment I've coded in a bunch of controllers, but I still don't have a
functional Rosegarden so I haven't been able to actually test any of it. I'm
inclined to put up what I've got regardless - being the weekend and all maybe
there's value in letting you guys experiment.
What's in there at the moment is ...
91 part effect 1 volume
92 part effect 2 volume
93 part effect 3 volume
102 ADsynth Filter Category
103 ADsynth Filter Type
104 Set kit item number for ADsynth Filter controls
105 ADsynth Filter LFO Frequency
106 ADsynth Filter LFO Depth
107 ADsynth Filter LFO Start
108 ADsynth Filter LFO Delay
109 ADsynth Filter Envelope Start
110 ADsynth Filter Envelope Attack
111 ADsynth Filter Envelope Decay Value
112 ADsynth Filter Envelope Decay Time
113 ADsynth Filter Envelope Release Time
114 ADsynth Filter Envelope Release Value
The potential value of any & all of those is open to argument. I figure the best
way to proceed might be to let people play around. The ones that are genuinely
useful and/or interesting will rise to to the top of the list, and we can
determine what warrants a controller assignment accordingly.
On 104 ... by default 105-114 get applied to part.kit[0], well theoretically at
least :-). By throwing in a 104 first, you can set the part.kit[x] that
subsequent
the filter controllers will operate on. It goes back to zero on a 'reset all
controllers'Whether that offers any real value in practice, I have no idea!
Whether it actually works in practice, I have no idea.
Give me a half hour or an hour to check that it basically still works and I'll
put it up on sf.
cheers.
Other related posts: