Re: [yoshimi-user] is it ready to call it 0.060?
- From: allcoms <allcoms@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cal <cal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:56:53 +0100
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:40 AM, cal <cal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It does seem like 0.060-pre2 is almost half decent. And I think I've
basically achieved the stated goals for it, basically just to add
Unison and jack session support. On the pyjacksm/jacksmtray issues -
a) as best I can tell, I've got the synth complying with the jack
session specs
b) yoshi's jack session support seems functional with qjackctl (svn!)
c) I haven't looked into it too deeply yet, but I'm inclined to think
that the failure to load connections with pyjacksm belongs to pyjacksm,
not yoshimi. I'm wide open to correction on that point though.
Yesterday I got all experimental again with a pre3. When I woke up this
morning I quickly came to the conclusion that going down that path again
would _not_ be a good idea. So before I do any serious damage with more
futzing about, I'm inclined to think I should just rule a line under it
there and call it 0.060. Reasonable?
I'm going to ask Torben now if he'd be willing to have a look at pre2
and see if he can tell you why its not working. I'm sorry to disagree
Cal but I think its yoshimi at fault here as I can save and restore
all JACK connections between A3 and bristol with both qjack and
pyjacksm so it must be possible to do this with A3 and yoshimi too.
So, I'm proposing we give Torben a few days to reply. If he's too busy
or not interested then pre2 can get promoted to a bonafide release.
Does that sound OK or am I the only person bothered about using
yoshimi with pyjacksm? I'd imagine more people will be bothered about
this when A3 gets released but I'd like this working as I want to
create some instructional vids for using A3 with pyjacksm, yoshimi,
specimen and bristol before it goes beta ie ASAP
?
Other related posts: