Hi Ray, I personally prefer HTML Emails. You can just hit enter on a link in Outlook, and Explorer opens at that web page, instead of all the hassle of copying the link into the clipboard, then switching to IE to open it, etc. Most blind people will probably disagree with me, but don't forget, you have all the quick navigation keys in an HTML message, such as T to navigate Tables, N for non-linked text in JAWS, or X in WE, etc, and it is so much easier to read Emails from companies especially, who give us special offers, such as Maplin, whose newsletters always interest me. I also take into consideration what Frank says about Eudora, although I don't use Eudora now, as I prefer Outlook for its calendar and contacts, etc, which Eudora does not have. I also agree that plain text messages are safer, but only up to a point. If you go to a link from a plain text message, you can still get whacked with a trojan, so I don't think this point is either valid or important any more. Just another point of view. All the best -- Computer Room Services: the long cane for blind computer users. Telephone Voice: +44(0)1438 742286, Fax/BBS: +44(0)1438 759589 mobile: +44(0)7956 334938, Email: Steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Web site: http://www.comproom.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ray's Home Sent: 08 March 2006 12:20 To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] HTML emails: really such a hassel? On several email lists from time to time, and too many to give specific mentions here, I've noted comments on the supposed unacceptability of HTML formatted emails on lists that accept them. Why is this? I know well that Text Email Fundamentalists as I think of them will thunder at the waste of space caused by HTML on email lists. While there's no getting away from the fact that HTML formatting does take up more space, important in a list circulating context, is there any reason, as such, to deplore HTML on grounds of accessibility? If such an email is less than perfectly accessible it is so only in the sense that a web page is less than accessible. So, the inaccessibility is in the coding, not in the fact of the committing of the sin of HTML. I ask this question because if I am ever asked by small organisations I sometimes work with informally what is best practice, I cannot, in all conscience, say HTML in emails is a definite no go area. What's your thoughts? Ray Personal emails: Email me at mailto:ray-48@xxxxxxxx ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq