Maybe they can have a bit of both worlds take some passengers up for the
staging/release and conduct some zero G vomit comet dips & climbs on the way
back. Hell, bugger the on the way back part just land in Hawaii and
throw in some snorkelling vouchers :)
Troy.
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Anthony Cesaroni
Sent: Tuesday, 8 December 2015 7:42 AM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: ALASA canceled because... Mixed Mono
<http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/12/04/virgin-galactic-will-launch-satel
lites-from-boeing-747.html>
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/12/04/virgin-galactic-will-launch-satell
ites-from-boeing-747.html
Anthony J. Cesaroni
President/CEO
Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace
<http://www.cesaronitech.com/> http://www.cesaronitech.com/
(941) 360-3100 x101 Sarasota
(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of qbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:qbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 11:03 PM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [AR] Re: ALASA canceled because... Mixed Mono
After the accident they still insisted that they were going ahead with
manned flights but they are also putting a lot of money into a new rocket
for use with the White Knight Two as an air launch to LEO for smaller
satellites.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/11816213/Virgin-Gal
actic-boldly-goes-into-small-satellites-telling-future-astronauts-you-have-t
o-wait.html
Robert
At 06:34 PM 12/6/2015, you wrote:
What ever happened to that thing?
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 6, 2015, at 5:00 PM, qbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:qbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So what your saying is not to buy a ticket for a ride on "Spaceship 2".
Robert
At 12:25 PM 12/6/2015, you wrote:
We have this discussion about nitrous every six months. There is plenty of
it in the archives for anyone curious. There are pictures of HPR nitrous
hybrid rockets turning into a constellation of small pieces. Tim Pickens
just posted to Facebookà a pic of a burst Marotta high pressure solenoid
from a nitrous event. If you google car nitrous explosion it is clear that
it is not a rare experience there either.Ã
Ã
On Sunday, December 6, 2015, Paul Mueller < paul.mueller.iii@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:paul.mueller.iii@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
I'd be interested in seeing the original source for the 1/4" liquid nitrous
oxide critical diameter number--it does seem to contradict the extensive
experience with liquid nitrous in racing applications that David mentions.
After all, if liquid nitrous could detonate like that, I would think someone
would have tested it as an explosive (strap a detonator onto or inside a
bottle of nitrous). Maybe that would work, but TNT is better...?
The SPG site ( http://www.spg-corp.com/nitrous-oxide-safety.html) states "it
is highly unlikely that a deflagration or detonation wave can be sustained
in pure (uncontaminated) liquid nitrous oxide." So I'm not sure what to
think.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 11:02 AM, David Gregory < david.c.gregory@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:david.c.gregory@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
The only literature I've located on the subject of N2O stability is here: Ã
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v
<http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=cm9ja2V0bW9vbmxpZ2h0aW5nL
mNvbXxob21lfGd4OjExOTMyNTk1MTE4ZTYzYjA>
&pid=sites&srcid=cm9ja2V0bW9vbmxpZ2h0aW5nLmNvbXxob21lfGd4OjExOTMyNTk1MTE4ZTY
zYjA
They have some very interesting conclusions. Ã Ã One of them is that
liquid N2O is largely stable and difficult to ignite. Ã However gaseous
N2O is remarkably easy to ignite, even with sudden compression. Ã Ã The
critical diameter for gaseous N2O is on the order of a few inches.
I take these conclusions to be consistent with the data for automotive and
HPR uses of N2O (few if any reported incidents). Ã Ã And also consistent
with the scaled accident - cold flows of liquid N2O inevitably also involve
two phase flows, and the SS2 motor would have been well above the critical
diameter.Ã Pg 28 has an interesting short discussion on unexplained
decomposition anomalies - several of which occurred when venting from a
pipe.
Note that quenching by the liquid phase is a common phenomenon - liquid
oxygen fires in most "compatible" materials are only ignitable in the
presence of the gaseous phase.Ã
-David
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Lloyd Droppers <ldroppers@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:ldroppers@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
Yes, saying that a liquid N2O has a 1/4" critical diameter means that a tube
larger that 1/4" will propagate a detonation wave while a smaller tube can
damp the detonation wave depending on the material, length, etc. Ã 1/4" is
actually a reasonable size as far as critical diameters for rocket
monopropellants. For Refà 90%HTP is 1.0
<http://permalink.lanl.gov/object/tr?what=info:lanl-repo/lareport/LA-UR-10-0
1464> " critical diameter, Nitromethane is 0.1
<http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/proceeding/aipcp/10.1063/1.2263489> ",
and I couldn't find anything else quickly.
I think that you might be setting up a false dichotomy in thinking gaseous
nitrous is the real bogeyman, as liquid nitrous is still a monopropellant
and potentially dangerous if not handled with care. You have probably seen
this but SPL has a nice intro on Nitrous safety
<http://www.spl.ch/publication/SPL_Papers/N2O_safety_e.pdf> .
Lloyd
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Paul Mueller < paul.mueller.iii@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:paul.mueller.iii@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
Thanks for the info and I'll try to educate myself. Meanwhile, does this
mean that a 1/4" tube full of liquid nitrous could propagate a detonation
wave due to dissociation (presumably the only energy source that could cause
a detonation wave)? This seems to contradict my previous understanding that
it is very difficult to have a dissociation reaction in liquid nitrous.
Gaseous nitrous is the real boogey-man here. Am I up in the night?
Paul M
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:08 AM, George Herbert <george.herbert@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:george.herbert@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
You really want Paul Coopers grad level textbook "Explosives Engineering".
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 4, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Ed LeBouthillier <codemonky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:codemonky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
Paul Mueller said
that it is about 1/4" for liquid nitrous oxide.Yeah, I'm not familiar with the "critical diameter" and what it means
The critical diameter is the diameter at which a detonation can proceeddown a tube.
Smaller than that, the detonation should not propagate, large than that,it should.
It's touched on here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive_material
and is more detailed here:
https://books.google.com/books?id=5P-mCAAAQBAJ<https://books.google.com/books?id=5P-mCAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA285&ots=42Lfa7DirE&dq=