[AR] Re: Catching Oumuamua

  • From: Rand Simberg <simberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:03:13 -0800

Mike Loucks might be even better. He did some porkchop plots for me gratis when I was looking at a private Enceladus mission. He's got the software all set up for it.

On 2/26/21 3:01 PM, Rand Simberg wrote:

Not sure I have the bandwidth to do that, but I'd ask John Carrico, if you know him. He does that sort of thing for recreation. It certainly doesn't seem implausible to me. That's the sort of thing that it would be nice to have a laser in orbit or on the moon that could push a sail. That would get it there a lot sooner.

On 2/26/21 2:52 PM, William Claybaugh wrote:
Rand:

I’d be real interested as to whether your independent astrodynamic analysis—at the spreadsheet level—could confirm that 60 klicks per second will catch it in about 20 years and that a plane change at Jupiter followed by a solar gravity assist and some makeup electric propulsion would allow a flyby.

Bill

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 3:35 PM Rand Simberg <simberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:simberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    I think there is scope for a lot of private missions in the solar
    system. Is Milner still planning an Enceladus mission?

    On 2/26/21 2:29 PM, William Claybaugh wrote:
    > Since we are not talking about homebuilt rockets, I was
    wondering if
    > we might talk about homebuilt space missions:
    >
    > A top level analysis suggests it would take about 60 Km / sec
    to catch
    > Oumuamua in about 20 years.
    >
    > Another very top level analysis suggests that a gravity assist at
    > Jupiter (solely to turn the plane from near ecliptic to near
    that of
    > Oumuamua; near to but less than 90 degrees) followed by a 50 solar
    > radii assist at the Sun (Parker is doing 10 radii as I recall
    but it
    > carries way too much heat shield for this mission) can pretty
    > certainly get to 50 km / sec.
    >
    > One of NASA Glenn’s Stirling cycle RTG’s tied to an existing
    > commercial electric thruster appears capable of making up the
    > difference with a big fuel tank.
    >
    > Assuming a New Horizons-like spacecraft, but much smaller, a flyby
    > seems possible based on this very top level analysis.
    >
    > I’d be real interested in helpful comments.
    >
    > Bill





Other related posts: