[AR] Re: Flight Computer

  • From: "Monroe L. King Jr." <monroe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:55:00 -0700

Xenomai might be another option I went with RTEMS because it was
mentioned in the information and has been used in space aplications
before.

Yeah, I'm in way over my head as usual. No it's not the full solution
but it looks like if I'm going to start from scratch it's likely a
better start than other options.

So far all I've done is download all the Core flight system stuff and do
the Git on RTEMS.

Tonight I try and load RTEMS on the bone.

One step at a time is all I know to do and ask for help from there.

I don't know much about the Netburner I never got one to play with.

The bone white has a usb load capability which makes working with it a
little easier.

The GOES-R Flight Software is more complete I hope I get to look at it.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [AR] Re: Flight Computer
From: Robert Watzlavick <rocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, December 21, 2015 1:25 pm
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


What kind of problems did you run into? I considered the BeagleBone
Black with FreeRTOS but ended up going with the Netburner MOD54415.

Monroe - I glanced over the OSAL stuff a while back and it looked very
sophisticated but I don't think it's a turnkey system. I think it's
more a set of middleware building blocks (messaging stack, file system,
etc.). If you have the time to invest in it, it would be interesting to
see how useful it turns out to be.

-Bob

On 12/21/2015 01:13 PM, doug knight wrote:

Monroe

I did not haveagood experience with beaglebones and hobby high power
rockets. They did not seem very robustly all. Of course YMMV.

Doug Knight



Other related posts: