Henry! Merry Christmas! And to ALL happy and safe.
What a great end of the year!
Cant wait to see next years accomplishments!
Space is cool again!
Monroe
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [AR] Re: Re spacex falcon 9 landing
From: Henry Spencer <hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, December 24, 2015 12:34 pm
To: Arocket List <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 24 Dec 2015, Ian Woollard wrote:
This subcooled methane idea, how is it supposed to work? ... ran
cpropep-web and looks like you'll get nearly the same Isp as Kerosene.
But the propellant density and impulse density is unimpressive.
Depending on conditions and details, Isp can be noticeably better than
kerosene -- not a huge gain, but a useful one.
Methane's density is not impressive compared to kerosene, but as Jeff
Greason once observed, you get a lot of that back because CH4 optimizes at
a higher mixture ratio, so there's more dense LOX in the mix. (Again,
this depends somewhat on conditions and details.)
I can see some small wins, like you it helps having the two propellants at
about the same temperature...
This may or may not be a win at all; e.g., it means doing cryo
conditioning on both sets of plumbing rather than just one.
but no big win. What am I missing?
The one big win is if you eventually want to refuel somewhere off Earth,
in which case it's a lot easier to make methane than anything resembling
kerosene. (Making hydrogen is easier yet -- indeed, making methane may
involve that as an intermediate step -- but it's much harder to store,
which is important since fuel-making is likely to be slow and you'll have
to accumulate fuel for a while. It's especially hard to store if you're
in an environment, like say the surface of Mars, where there's enough
atmosphere to ruin the effectiveness of MLI.)
That aside, yes, it's small wins rather than big ones. Maybe enough to be
interesting, depending on your intentions.
To be honest, Musk really needs a hydrogen upper stage.
Remember, he had a hydrogen-engine project at one point. Then it went on
the back burner. Then it went on the very back burner. Don't think it's
been heard from at all lately. He appears to have reached a different
conclusion about what he needs, probably because he's got different ideas
about what the crucial figures of merit are.
Henry
P.S. Yes, I'm back! :-)