[AR] Re: starship abort?

  • From: Rand Simberg <simberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 11:43:08 -0700

I don't know if they announced it, but I'd think they'd want as much back as possible for forensics.

On 4/21/23 11:39, roxanna Mason wrote:

I guess then, unless SpaceX made an announcement that they want their stuff back, then it's yours?

Ken

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:22 AM Ben Brockert <wikkit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Citation needed. This is a debris-generating attempted space
    launch, not a cargo ship lightening their load. And even if it
    was, the finder of jetsam “is not required to return them to their
    rightful owner except in the case where the latter makes a legally
    abiding claim” which is a bigger process than the most likely
    Twitter post or email.

    On Friday, April 21, 2023, Henry Spencer <hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    wrote:

        On Fri, 21 Apr 2023, Ben Brockert wrote:

            Heat shield tiles are starting to wash up on the beach. I
            hope people
            put them up on ebay, and don't fall for any "that's spacex
            property
            you must return it" bullshit.


        Actually, maritime salvage law is quite clear:  debris of
        identifiable origin, which hasn't been explicitly abandoned
        (e.g. thrown overboard to lighten ship), continues to belong
        to the original owner.  I think the same rules apply to
        aviation.  Just because they lost it and you found it,
        *doesn't* mean it's yours to keep or sell.

        Now, that doesn't mean you're obliged to spend your own time
        and money returning it to them; if they want it back, they
        ought to do the legwork or offer to cover costs (plus
        something for time and trouble).  And if they have any sense,
        for stuff of minimal value they'll just say "oh, keep it". 
        But legally that's their call, because it really *is* still
        their property.

        Henry

Other related posts: