Hello. Last week, we briefly talked about the major factors of Atheism
emergence in the west. Today, I brought you a sternly intriguing
aspect of the subject. Atheists constantly dissent with faith and
tradition. In order to be heard, they act rebelliously. For many
traditionalists, they are considered apostates. Thence, they
intemperately despise religious consignment. Nevertheless, are they
settled on scientific basis? We proved their infrangible nescience of
rational basics. Science to them is merely enveloped in big bang and
evolution theories which they gravely misapprehend. So, what is the
psychological state of an Atheist? At its inception, they generically
manipulate and hector others. They like to influentially dominate us.
They consider you to be so stupid and that's why you're religious. So
for instance, they generically associate cosmos provenience to the
big bang theory. It is the cosmic explosion that is hypothesised to
have marked the origin of the universe. So, they base their
proposition on essentially conjectured conception. Well, is the big
bang a decisively scientific fact? Or, it's just the best explanation
theorised by modern scholars. The Atheists will most likely respond,
that the universe is perceived as opposed to God. We couldn't perceive
God with any of our five senses. Thereof, deception begins. He flees
from any logical discussion. For him, God is invisible. He will only
believe in Him if he could excuse me, examine Him at the science
laboratory. For believers, that's a total blasphemy to even imagine
this happening. Well unfortunately, that's the only way to convince an
Atheist about the existence of God, simple as that. Therefore,
Atheists firmly stick to empirical evidence. Nevertheless, they
accepted the big bang theory to interpret how this universe came into
being. Well obviously, none of us witnessed the universe's
commencement. Thence, we theorised the big bang. So, they tell us it's
not so intelligent to base concepts on theories but now, we proved
they established their explanation of how the universe unfolded on
theoretical fundament. So now, atheistic fallacious characteristics
have been revealed. They accepted what they relentlessly denied. Now,
when they have got nothing else to explain the mysterious beginning of
the universe with, they submissively sought refuge with theoretical
explanation. Nevertheless, if we tell them that the divine theory, let
us just put it like this, the divine theory is the rationally proper
explanation of this well designed, well organised and vastly sustained
universe, they will obstinately decline. Now, would I be possibly
scolded if I call them absolute chiselers? They are psychologically
manipulated with abhorrently megalomanic state. If we are to somewhat
psychoanalyse their mental development, we'll find them robustly
attempting to prevent rational substantiation. It's tremendously
crucial to fathom this factor about them. Furthermore, they attempt to
coerce their debater to remain in what I terminologically define as
barren philosophy. It's basically a useless argument which seeks
nothing but further argumentation. It therefore becomes a vicious
cycle. It's one trouble leads to another that aggravates the first. I
therefore urge my respected spectators not to unwisely waste their
time and intellectual vitality debating them. I would only proceed in
a conversation with some of them if they civilly concur to abide by
rational discussion's terms and conditions. I pragmatically proved to
you that Atheists are mostly eccentric people. Life is utterly
purposeless for them and moral standards are radically influenced with
the theory of relativism. Atheistic perspective is essentially based
on materialistic view. If you like to know how an Atheist thinks, I
urge you then to read a book called the God delusion authored by the
primarily substantial leader of modernday Atheists, English
ethologist, Richard Dawkins. Up until I concentratively read this
book, I didn't know something about atheistic psychological tenets.
Now I knew they are radically grounded on philistinism. Disclaimer,
this book is implausibly disgusting but it's definitely worth reading
if you wish to discern atheistic psychology. Thank you for reading,
Mustafa
________________________________________