[etni] Dovrat revisited, etc

  • From: Renee Whal <renew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:31:28 +0200

Hi,
I wonder whether you read the Dovrat report, David?  I think that perhaps not 
all teachers read it, but a great many did, including a great many English 
teachers, who, like me,  had to wade through hundreds of pages of Hebrew to do 
so.
Dovrat was a bad deal for teachers, but the present program is even worse.  
Although it was a long and wordy document, Dovrat was very sparce with  details 
and vague on how the various 'reforms' were going to be worked out.  Just one 
example was the sweeping statement that teachers would be provided with their 
own workspace at school.  There was no mention about when in the reform this 
would take place (before the teachers had to start spending 36 hours at school, 
one month after, 10 years after); what kind of facilities each teacher would 
have at their disposal (desk, chair, room, locker, cubby, computer, printer, 
phone) ; who was going to pay for these facilities and how much.
There was not one teacher on the Dovrat committee.  Out of the approximately 
150 (or was it 250 - It's been a long time since I read it) witnesses who 
appeared before the committee (see the list at the end of the report),  only 3 
principals appeared and 2 pupils.  There were no representatives of either of 
the teachers' unions on the committee, nor were they invited to appear before 
the committee.

Regarding the future of education in this country, I am not willing to trust 
the intelligence (or the integrity) of any politician,  journalist, Asa-El 
included, or Ran Erez.  But I'm trusting my own intelligence and considerable 
experience.

Just because we are vociferously against the bad deal we're being pressured 
into accepting, doesn't mean we're "shooting off our mouths"!  Yes, it is hard 
to get teachers to agree to any reform.  They tend to examine these reforms 
(which are usually proposed by politicians in an effort to save money on 
education) carefully.  I would just like to remind you of a recent reform in 
English teaching which teachers were not happy to accept:  The whole language 
approach to reading. 

No reform in education can be successful without the full and enthusiastic 
cooperation of the teachers who have to implement it.  This cooperation can 
only be obtained through a serious discussion of the issues, mutual respect and 
serious consideration of teacher input.  Never by court order, dictated by 
businessmen or politicians, smear campaigns by the media, or delegitimization 
of our representatives (even if they aren't perfect).

Renee Wahl

Other related posts:

  • » [etni] Dovrat revisited, etc