---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: sharon tzur <sharontzu5@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: pro - log Dear Friends: I appeal to all of you who have reservations against the new lit program NOT to fight to eliminate the option of Logs! first, it is an option - no one has to do it, but some of us might choose to do it. (Yes, the issue of pay still needs to be addressed.) To me, the most critical issue is maintaining the teacher's freedom to choose his/her lit texts, and this is not just a matter of personal preference; it is a pedagogical issue. Literature must be chosen with a particular class in mind. this is especially true in a country like ours, with so many different types of populations. A text suitable for a secular coed class might be a poor choice for a group of young women in a Haradi school, etc. The national exam is always going to choose rather bland literature for this very reason. As for the problem of cheating, parents doing the log etc. - it is my understanding that the summative assessment is (or at least can be) and EXAM - and that part is given 80% weight. In my school, we are planning to come up with a standardized format for such an exam - (one for 4 points and one for 5 points) - including how many questions are to be given of each type. These tests will actually be pretty much the same as the type of lit exams we have always given.I have written to Judy suggesting that such a standardized format for the summative assessment be adopted for the entire country. (Actually, we can use the written lit bagrut as a model of what the class exam should look like). The other 20% for each piece will be based on - 10% for a piece of writing done in class, and 10% - anything else the teacher wishes to include - homework, participation, attendance, a worksheet done in class, etc. If this is done, it should greatly alleviate the problems of kids not doing their own work, and parental pressure for higher grades. (I find that parents rarely argue with test results) - and I hope will prevent the pressure that will inevitably be upon us to push three pointers to four points by cutting corners on the log. As to moving from four to five - that is a problem. I think we can try to teach some pieces that are suitable for both 4 and 5. If a student moves from 4 to 5, as long as that student has done an equivalent piece of lit, then perhaps he/she can simply put a different piece into his/her log. Perhaps a "bridging" exam - an exam on the same piece but with some questions at a higher level - could be a prerequisite for moving between from four to five. ----------------------------------------------- ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** -----------------------------------------------