This would be an unmitigated disaster, and is as bad in theory as it would be in practice. Merit pay will always be attached to some measure, which will always be established by someone outside the classroom, which will increase stress levels and orient teaching in various unwanted directions. What most people want of an educational system are things that are very difficult to measure. Let's take active engagement and ownership of the material - let's take Laurie Orenstein and poetry - as an example. As Ms. Widerker related, her child engaged in spontaneous poetry writing. Others might read more. Others might just engage with what they read differently or more actively. Do any of you think that "active engagement and ownership of the material" would be a basis for merit pay? What will be a basis are things than are easy to measure, think vocabularies and certain grammatical structures, which students can master without taking the context - the actual ability to powerfully use a language - into account. As a result, teachers will turn their attention from what really matters to those things that are rewarded, the irony being that if they do engage in what I say really matters, those skills that are rewarded will advance at a much greater pace, but the pressure will be on spending time drilling on the things that will be tested. What is needed is a fair competitive compensation package so that there are always people willing to take on teaching as a profession, a solid structure for support and improvement, and a fair manner to remove teachers who are not working out. Yours truly, David R. Herz drherz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.educatingisrael.com Bet Rimon 052-579-1859 ----------------------------------------------- ** The ETNI Rag ** http://www.etni.org/etnirag/ Much more than just a journal ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org or - http://www.etni.org.il ** ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** -----------------------------------------------