[opendtv] Re: News: DIRECTV Sued Over HDTV Picture Quality
- From: Tom Barry <trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:34:10 -0400
Craig Birkmaier wrote:
> The more likely outcome is that the government will proceed with the
> subsidized receiver program, then someone will notice that they do not
> work as well as NTSC. This will be sufficient grounds to begin an
> investigation, putting the 2009 switch-over on hold. When it is learned
> that the system is fundamentally flawed there will be a move to develop
> a new system that will leapfrog all of the existing technologies. It
> might be ready for deployment by 2020...
I sort of agree with this scenario except I'm not sure any CE
manufacturer will be willing to provide the $50 converters that will be
the fall guy for this. It might be costly and embarrassing as the focus
of "why they don't work" may be concentrated on those boxes.
So as 2009 approaches it may turn out nobody is willing to make them.
- Tom
At 6:33 PM -0400 9/21/06, Stephen W. Long wrote:
Ah, but there might be grounds to sue the ATSC (and their sponsoring
companies) for knowingly promoting a flawed system.
The system IS what it is. And a government agency approved it.
So I doubt that the ATSC could be held liable for providing a system
that generally meets the criteria established by the FCC.
There's been a bunch of noise in the past week about officials at the
FCC ordering certain reports buried or destroyed. This is not a rare
occurrence. It is the normal mode of operation for a bureaucracy that
REACTS to legislative and regulatory mandates, rather than guiding
communications policy in the U.S. The FCC did not have the budget,
talent or resources to lead the development of a proper digital
broadcast infrastructure for the United States. So they turned the "hen
house" over to the foxes. In so doing they ALSO established basic
criteria for the system that drew upon the available resources at the
FCC and tools they had to actually implement the system. And, to be
fair, they did not have the desire to take on the broadcasters and start
a political battle that necessarily would have required Congress to
change the ground rules.
Bottom line, there is so much blame to spread around that even the best
lawyers in the country would have a hard time pinning the blame on any
entity that has financial resources worth going after.
The more likely outcome is that the government will proceed with the
subsidized receiver program, then someone will notice that they do not
work as well as NTSC. This will be sufficient grounds to begin an
investigation, putting the 2009 switch-over on hold. When it is learned
that the system is fundamentally flawed there will be a move to develop
a new system that will leapfrog all of the existing technologies. It
might be ready for deployment by 2020...
Regards
Craig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
--
Tom Barry trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx
Find my resume and video filters at www.trbarry.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts: